User talk:Maggie4695
Welcome[edit]
Hello, Maggie4695 and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.
If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Helpme}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.
Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.
Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, if your class doesn't already have one. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.
We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Jprg1966 (talk) 22:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 21:44, Saturday, May 25, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
February 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paul Cadmus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 704 | title=Paul Cadmus |publisher=Smithsonian American Art Museum | accessdate=11 February 2013}}</ref> He furthered his education while traveling through Europe from 1931 to 1933 with fellow
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Re: Articles for Deletion Project[edit]
Certainly. Deletion on Wikipedia is performed in accordance with the deletion policy. There are three main avenues for deletion on Wikipedia: speedy deletion, proposed deletion, and deletion discussions. Deletion can occur for a number of reasons. I suppose the most basic and fundamental reason to delete an article is if the article is not suitable for an encyclopedia. But different editors have different opinions on what is suitable and what isn't. Thus, notability was established. A lack of notability is probably the largest reason articles are deleted on Wikipedia. Generally, a subject is presumed notable for a standalone Wikipedia article if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If a subject has not received this significant coverage, it is assumed that a quality, well-researched article cannot be written about the subject, and the article is deleted. A notability concern will usually go through the deletion discussions avenue, but if the issue is so obvious that it is believed no editor would oppose it, the proposed deletion process is used instead.
In addition to notability, articles can be deleted for other reasons too. Wikipedia is free content, meaning anyone can use and distribute its text for any purpose, subject to certain terms and conditions. Plagiarism and copyright infringement is therefore unacceptable, and any article that is unambiguously a copyright violation of another source may be speedily deleted from Wikipedia (see WP:CSD#G12). There are some more obvious reasons for deleting an article: nonsense, vandalism, blatant hoaxes, blatant advertising, and attack pages can be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. See the criteria for speedy deletion and valid reasons for deletion.
From my experience, I think the most common subjects of articles that get nominated for deletion are probably people and organizations. Many new editors on Wikipedia will start by trying to write an article about themselves or about their company. This is discouraged for a number of reasons; namely, conflict of interest. Very few people and companies receive the significant coverage required for notability. There is actually a speedy deletion criterion that says if an article about a real person, an organization, an event, an animal, or a piece of web content does not have a credible claim of significance or importance, it may be speedily deleted without discussion. Schools and educational institutions are exempt from this criterion, because there is a longstanding precedent that high schools and degree-awarding universities are significant in their respective communities, and will almost always meet notability guidelines.
We have a page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Common outcomes that lists common outcomes and trends that occur at deletion discussions for specific topic areas. You may find that helpful. I hope this rather lengthy rundown of Wikipedia deletion has been helpful to you. Thank you for your contributions! Mz7 (talk) 22:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)