User talk:MMike94

MMike94, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MMike94! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation! MMike94 (talk) 18:32, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rudolf Pichlmayr has been accepted

Rudolf Pichlmayr, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 13:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rehabilitation Center Ederhof

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rehabilitation Center Ederhof, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 03:46, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Rehabilitation Center Ederhof moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rehabilitation Center Ederhof, is far too promotional as written as written to remain published. I recognize it's from the deWP, which is usually very reliable, but their practice with respect to promotionalism is sometimes more permissive than ours. WP:ADVOCACY is a basic policy on Wikipedia. I've moved the draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's standards for objectivity, and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

As advice on a guideline, if it reads like it would do for the organization's web page, it's not suitable for an encyclopedia. The best way of going about it is to first look for sentences expressing excellence, and remove them, unless they have an unimpeachable source.We do not usually consider praise of the organization from official sources at a ceremony to be reliable. After that, look at the wording, and try for condensation. DGG ( talk ) 23:29, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

the deWP and the enWP

To avoid repeating it, please see my comments at [1] on Olaf Kosinsky's user talk page. I will do whatever I can to assist. DGG ( talk ) 00:25, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your remarks. I’ve been taking them into consideration with the posts I’m doing. Appreciate it. MMike94 (talk) 18:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rehabilitation Center Ederhof

Hello, MMike94. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rehabilitation Center Ederhof, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rehabilitation Center Ederhof

Hello, MMike94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rehabilitation Center Ederhof".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Veverve (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2022 (UTC)