User talk:MACBurnstar

July 2020[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:57, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Ignite India Education, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk I have removed it because it's not meeting to the speedy deletion. I have created the page . I am an editor like you . Don't add this tag again . If you wish to discuss you may so do on talk page . MACBurnstar (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not how the speedy deletion process works. As the page creator you may not remove it - an admin will either remove the tag or delete the article when it is reviewed. - MrOllie (talk) 20:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 20:48, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/EditorF, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MrOllie (talk) 22:05, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MACBurnstar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here :

I am writing this unblock request because - 1. the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. 2. the block is no longer necessary because I understood reason why I have been blocked . 3. I understand that I have been blocked for using multiple accounts which I was not aware not to use . I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, I will make sure that I make useful contributions to wikipedia . EditorF (talk) 13:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to first request unblock from your original account, and when doing so specifically respond to the points mentioned instead of just repeating them back to us, to ensure understanding. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 13:31, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.