User talk:Lundimint

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ruth A. Etzel (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Lundimint! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

WP:COI Refspamming

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Last warning for conflict-of-interest reference spamming

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:23, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

ISCHE

Hi! :) RE your comment at Talk:International Society for Children's Health and the Environment, I'm not sure what you mean by 'this message', but I'm guessing you're referring to the additional citations needed tag? In which case, there are two aspects to this.

Firstly, it's not clear where the 2nd half of the 1st para comes from, as there is no source cited at the end of that passage; basically, every material statement should be supported by a citation.

Secondly, unless I'm mistaken, both the sources cited are authored by people associated with the organisation in question. Notability is established with significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources, and it is a bit debatable whether those articles therefore suffice. If you can find additional sources (newspapers, books, etc.), please add those.

As for your concern about spamming, I haven't looked into the instances you refer to, but as a general comment, there are some editors (and I'm in no way suggesting this applies to you) who add 'references' which are mostly intended to drive traffic to commercial websites and similar destinations. On the whole, though, I would say that under-referencing is a much bigger problem that over-referencing (as in, adding references where they may not strictly speaking be required).

Hope this helps. Cheers, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:51, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International Society for Children's Health and the Environment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Society for Children's Health and the Environment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58,

10 March 2021 (UTC)

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. Please also read the the guidance below:

• you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
• The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

1. significant coverage in
2. independent,
3. multiple,
4. reliable,
5. secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:25, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel

Hello, Lundimint. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Lundimint/sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel

Hello, Lundimint. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Ruth A. Etzel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest editing

Hello, Lundimint. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Environmental epidemiology‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Kimen8 (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

It seems you were warned for COI/refspam back in February of 2021, twice (1, 2), with the second one being called your "last warning". In this edit to Environmental epidemiology you've added an external link to a site for a society where you appear to be a committee member. I'd like to also point out you never did do what you are obligated to do with a conflict of interest, which is to declare it on your userpage as laid out in the previous warnings.

Kimen8 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Next block will be indef

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)