User talk:LilianaUwU/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Welcome!
Hi LilianaUwU! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. I appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism – if you'd like to get more involved, you may want to check out the WikiLoop Double Check anti-vandalism tool or enroll in the Counter-Vandalism Unit's training academy.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
Fettlemap (talk) 00:14, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
wp:BLPs shouldn't be a hagiography, it's "warts and all". Thanks Adakiko (talk) 22:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
Gadget recommendation
Hey Liliana, I’ve seen you around recent changes patrol quite a bit. Just thought I’d drop by and make a recommendation for a tool— Twinkle. It makes common countervandalism tasks (e.g. reverting, warning messages) much easier to perform. If you’re interested, all you need to do to enable it is to click a button in the Gadgets section of your preferences (it’s under ‘browsing’). :) Helen(💬📖) 19:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
Nick Yarris
The unconstructive, WP:BLP violating, WP:COI suspect, WP:RS disregarding edits by a persistent IP user, who has never engaged with the patiently-explained reversions of their "edits" -- which you undid just a week or two ago -- have been reinstated, for at least the third time. Can you initiate a block on this vandal? PDGPA (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
Spastic (word)
You have just reverted a constructive, good faith edit I made to the talk page for Spastic (word). It is unusual to revert talk page edits without a good reason, and it is uncivil to revert any good faith edit without discussion. I will leave your revert in place, but please consider if your editing behaviour is appropriate. Ef80 (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
why oyu rever my edit
why did you revert my edit 50.93.28.32 (talk) 04:50, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- I thought the previous map was fine as it was? Liliana (UwU) 04:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- what is the sandbox for 50.93.28.32 (talk) 04:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Just a note and reminder
Hey! Hope you are having a good day! I just wanted to let you know: Per WP:BLANKING, a user, whether registered or unregistered, is allowed to remove warnings from their own talk page. It indicates that they are aware of the contents, plus page history exists, so we can look at the warnings that way. There are a few exceptions, but warning templates are not one of them. Just wanted to let you know. Thanks, and have a good day! :) Yoshi24517 Chat Online 02:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Filling station
Thanks for the explaination but it was a minor edit in a silly topic that's why I didn't bother with the ref (the others countries don't have one either) I added one source to the history edits just in case but if you want to revert it again it's fine. Saludos 181.84.128.31 (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Edits
Why did you get rid if the Dick Stone edit? He was literally the 10,000 MLB player. It's a fact. His wiki is already very small, let's add more facts about him. 2600:1700:ADF0:7A80:FDE8:AA2:672E:B25C (talk) 03:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Because you failed to WP:CITE a reliable source supporting the content you added. See WP:BURDEN. General Ization Talk 03:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- What General Ization said. I mean, my summary literally said "unsourced". Liliana (UwU) 22:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Help
IP 79.66.222.112 is still reverting edits and deleted mine and your message in thier talk page. S.G ReDark (talk) 23:36, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- As said above (User talk:LilianaUwU#Just a note and reminder), WP:BLANKING doesn't prohibit a user from removing their warnings, as they're in the history. I would still report them to WP:3RRV if I were you, though. Liliana (UwU) 00:01, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh definitely I will, but this will be my first time doing so will me luck lol S.G ReDark (talk) 00:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Draftifying articles
Hello, LilianaUwU,
Often when you find an article lacks notability, rather than tagging it for deletion, it's better to move it to Draft space. This is only for recently created articles, that is, ones that have been created in the last 3 months. There is a great user script User:Evad37/MoveToDraft that allows you to draftify articles in just a few moves and, best of all, posts a notification on the talk page of the article creator. I use this tool the most when there are questions about notability because its possible that an editor can improve a draft over time and find adequate sourcing. Any way, you might try it out but use it judiciously. Liz Read! Talk! 06:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
ANI mention
Hi, LilianaUwU! I mentioned your name at ANI, in the thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Donovanjustin, Salve Regina University. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:27, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Edits reverted
I have made some major edits to Vicinity Centres, including removing advertising content, and removing outdated information. You have reverted this, and called it vandalism, can you explain this? Sincerely, 49.192.44.178 (talk) 02:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Having a second look at it, I agree that the article seems a bit better. One gripe I have with your edits, however, is the suggestion to split the article. As the template on top says, it "contain[s] an excessive amount of intricate detail that may interest only a particular audience", something that wouldn't be helped with an History of Vicinity Centres article. Also, I would add the COI template back. Liliana (UwU) 02:50, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Suggest wp:BRI or IBRI You could request talk privileges be revoked though wouldn't wast too much time. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 05:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Bing Xia, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Such claims need secondary, not primary, sourcing, and so the IP's comment that these were "inappropriate" citations was correct. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 01:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
Tagging socks
Please stop tagging socks and leave it to admins/cus/clerks. Thanks. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:26, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
"5100" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 5100 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#5100 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 64.229.88.43 (talk) 03:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Template:Types of Han Chinese clothing
Hi LilianaUwU,
I noticed that the recent edits on the template: Types of Han Chinese clothing have been reverted; I wanted to update it since it had not been updated for a long time. I was wondering if the reverts was because there was a problem with it (template-wise or content wise) or if there was a missing step in the procedure. It is my first time trying to update a template so I wasn’t sure. Thank you. Gyuligula2 (talk) 19:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- It seemed like you were adding a lot of red links to the template, hence why I reverted. Liliana (UwU) 21:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, thank you for the quick answer. Would it be ok if for me place back an updated updated-version with the red links removed? Best, Gyuligula2 (talk) 12:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Democratic Party of Korea
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Democratic Party of Korea. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss the matter with other editors on the article’s talk page and try and reach a consensus before changing anything. I have restored the page to the version before the edit waring began by multiple editors with the exception of information which doesn't appear to be disputed, such as the party's change in leadership. All the best. Helper201 (talk) 03:06, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Helper201: I gotta admit, I randomly stumbled upon the page via Recent changes and assumed that the IPs were vandalizing, hence the two reverts. I can see that they weren't all bad, so I'll leave the page be for now. Liliana (UwU) 03:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
just delete Talk:2023/FAQ
Talk:2023/FAQ is worthless until the start of 2023, why I even make it in the first place, just deleted we don't need until 2023 starts. 4me689 (talk) 02:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I can't delete it myself, but you could always put the text in your sandbox and request speedy deletion. Liliana (UwU) 02:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Femke (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
So where are requests for articles on websites supposed to be posted now? 108.31.160.73 (talk) 02:44, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- ...I mean, I thought it was spam. The way you requested it made me think it was. Liliana (UwU / nya) 02:45, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Sources needed for Days of the Year pages
I see you recently accepted a pending change to September 8 that did not include a direct source.
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide.
All new additions to the DOY pages without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. Another editor has gone ahead and backed this edit out.
All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, it's not required but it sure would be helpful if you didn't accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages.
Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 18:24, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Can you please talk to Spike em
on the Antigua and Barbuda national football team page. I am an Antiguan citizen with extensive knowledge and this just came erased my contribution to this team. What makes him better than anyone to erase all my work. And your saying I can't be offended by this behavior 197.248.92.154 (talk) 22:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- You can't attack people no matter how unconstructive their edits are (WP:NPA). Liliana (UwU / nya) 22:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Additional source
What are you talking about? I am that additional source. Matt.h559 (talk) 04:03, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Reversion
Hi,
You just reverted my reversion on the The Queue. That was reverting a BLAR, was done deliberately - and so should have gone to AfD, rather than being reverted again Nosebagbear (talk) 21:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Ryn Weaver
I'm a beginner Wiki editor so I'm not sure if I am doing this right. I just tried editing the page for Ryn Weaver to include a new picture and a personal life section that states she's bisexual. My reason for doing this is that she's my friend and we are on FaceTime right now and she told me she hates the picture on her Wiki page and we should figure out how to change it. While doing so I also figured we should add in that she's bi. She's never said this in an online interview or anything but it's not a secret at all. I understand why it's problematic to include info like that without a public written source and am willing to let that go but I (and she!) would like it if you could update the image to something more recent. Thank you! Your-jacket (talk) 07:53, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Your-jacket: Please read WP:COI regarding your connection with Miss Weaver. LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 08:31, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Trouted
|
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: On Jesse McCartney, you reverted an IP removing unsourced roles that they were correct to remove. Unsourced content can be challenged and removed - a source being needed for "those voices not being him" is kinda nonsense. Waxworker (talk) 11:01, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Those edits
Don't warn, don't revert, just report; reverting just means more work for us. Drmies (talk) 00:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Your signature and linter errors
Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to [[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#00c6ff;">''Liliana''</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#ff879a;">''UwU''</span>]] <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contribs]])</sup> ASAP.
The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature. Sheep (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Wing Chung
Hello, I undone your revert. A consensus isn't needed for material not sourced, which over half the list has been. Also, there is a procedure for how lists are suppose to be done. Lists are suppose to have their own pages and be linked to. Presumably this is why the practitioners page was changed to this format as well, this also makes how lists are handled consistent within the page. Please post on the Wing Chun talk page if you have any other concerns on the format that lists within an article should take. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lists_within_articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bverji (talk • contribs) 03:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Chris Kirkpatrick page
You are vandalizing this page by deleting all the content. There is no justification for deleting this content, as additional references have been added that you are not recognizing. An administrator will be contacted if you continue to do this. Katerpillarfly (talk) 04:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- You didn't add references when I first reverted your edits... LilianaUwU (talk / contribs) 04:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)