User talk:Liance/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Congrats... You have joined a team of awesome helpers!
|
Teahouse Host Badge |
| Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time. Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden. | |
| This is what I meant to do. Thanks for offering your contributions to the Teahouse. I look forward to seeing you around.
 | |
Welcome to STiki!
|
Hello, Liance, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC) |
|
G U H O O Y A M F
Hello Lance, with all respect I have done my reaserch with the necesary citations and all, and even the film itself is recognized by many people as a satirical black comedy drama film, even wikipedia says it here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Beauty_(1999_film)#External_links, so there you go I´ve got enough evidence that American Beauty IS actually a black comedy satirical drama, and I would really appreciate if you stopped taking out my sources and my editting because I have to do my research all over again. Ok, thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by CHCHque verchis (talk • contribs) 19:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, CHCHque verchis. I believe you are mistaken, as I have not taken out any sources or citations and another editor has reverted your edits and has added an edit summary explaining that, although many sources say that it is indeed black comedy and satire, the consensus is to exclude the genres from the lead section. ~Liancetalk/contribs 19:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
cdommonly
Hello, Why is my first edit unconstructive? I just changed cdommonly for commonly because the article had a sign that said spelling needed to be improved. I don't understand why you put that message on my talk page. If I did something wrong please let me know what. --Ateneas Tree (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- So sorry, Ateneas Tree. I made that mistake by mixing up the before and after diffs. I have redacted the warnings. Sorry about that! ~Liancetalk/contribs 21:14, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Not a problem, I was a bit confused. Thank you.--Ateneas Tree (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the welcome! --Ateneas Tree (talk) 20:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Trouted
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
I decide to trout myself, for I have made countless mistakes today. I will be more careful in the future. ~Liancetalk/contribs 21:17, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
I have restored, but I'm not sury if it's the end.Xx236 (talk) 05:57, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why you left this message, Xx236. Could you please explain further what you meant by "I'm not sury if it's the end"? At the page "List of Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmarks, it seems as if you have reverted vandalism correctly, and I have also. ~Liancetalk/contribs 13:14, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015 September newsletter
The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.
In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far 
Casliber (submissions) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was 
Coemgenus (submissions) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points.
The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
Cas Liber (submissions), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points.
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles.
Harrias (submissions), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about cricket and military history, specifically the 1640s First English Civil War.
West Virginian (submissions), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia.- Rodw (submissions), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about Scheduled monuments in Somerset and a FT about English Heritage properties in Somerset.
Rationalobserver (submissions), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round.
Calvin999 (submissions), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48.
The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.
Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!
Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 11:48, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
edits to Morris Brown College
Hi there --
Thanks for your message. I was in the process of adding the source to the article when I received your message -- sorry that I'm not savvy enough to be able to undo the previous edit and add new content in a single edit. Anyway, I believe the current state of the article will satisfy your concerns. --- Heath 50.134.34.221 (talk) 13:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry! See my response on your talk page. ~Liancetalk/contribs 14:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015: The results
.svg)
WikiCup 2015 is now in the books! Congrats to our finalists and winners, and to everyone who took part in this year's competition.
This year's results were an exact replica of last year's competition. For the second year in a row, the 2015 WikiCup champion is 
Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points). All of his points were earned for an impressive 253 featured pictures and their associated bonus points (5060 and 1695, respectively). His entries constituted scans of currency from all over the world and scans of medallions awarded to participants of the U.S. Space program. 
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came in second place; she earned by far the most bonus points (4082), for 4 featured articles, 15 good articles, and 147 DYKs, mostly about in her field of expertise, natural science. 
Cas Liber (submissions), a finalist every year since 2010, came in third, with 2379 points.
Our newcomer award, presented to the best-performing new competitor in the WikiCup, goes to 
Rationalobserver (submissions). Everyone should be very proud of the work they accomplished. We will announce our other award winners soon.
A full list of our award winners are:
- Godot13 (submissions) (FP bonus points) wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 330 featured pictures in the final round.
- Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 160 did you knows in the final round (310 in all rounds).
- Cas Liber (submissions) wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for 26 featured articles in all rounds.
- West Virginian (submissions) wins the prize for fourth place
- Calvin999 (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
- Rationalobserver (submissions) wins a final 8 prize.
- Harrias (submissions) wins a final 8 prize and the FL prize for 11 featured lists.
- Rodw (submissions) wins the most prizes: a final 8 prize, the GA prize for 41 good articles, and the topic prize for a 13-article good topic and an 8-article featured topic, both in round 3.
ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the news prize for the most news articles in round 3.
We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2016 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · logs), Miyagawa (talk · contribs · logs) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · logs) 18:39, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. I took your speedy off to put a prod-BLP on. CEO may be regarded by some as a claim to significance, but you're welcome to put it back on, so far as I'm concerned. Peridon (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Y U DO DIS
YA JUST HAD TO REQUEST FOR SPEEDY DELETION DIDN'T YA? YOU KNOW WHAT? SHAME ON YOU. SHAME ON YOUR COW .NuggetMC (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Please see WP:PAGEMOVE for instructions how move pages. Cut-and-paste moves are disallowed in wikipedia due to our license rules. - üser:Altenmann >t 00:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, I gave you wrong link. Since you are not an admin, you have to request a page move; see Wikipedia:Requested moves. - üser:Altenmann >t 01:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, I should have known better than to cut-and-paste move the page. I'm not 100% sure on if the page should be moved that way, so I have left it as a suggestion on the article's talk page. -Liancetalk/contribs 01:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
App hide
Good Halwala (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Emergency Halwala (talk) 02:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- I don't quite understand your message; could you please be a bit more specific if you are trying to contact me? Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 04:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...
Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.
After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.
We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.
The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.
If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Norumbega
I've mentioned the 2nd removal of the Davistown link on the article's talk page. I note that you used an edit summary to explain one deletion but not this one. I've also taken it to WP:ELN. Doug Weller (talk) 07:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!!! |
|
Hello Liance, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
WikiCup 2016: Game On!
We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.
We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
changing my page
stop changing my page. Why should the page of Jack Hansen be a dead rugby player who played no significant role in this world. I deserve a wiki page over him since I am actually alive. Leave this page alone so I can get on with my life.
Thanks, Jack Hansen
- I have replied on your talk page. -Liancetalk/contribs 21:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for removing the personal attack
I also report this user for Wikipedia:Sock puppetry see [1] and [2]--185.31.77.52 (talk) 20:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Check Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations--185.31.77.52 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
so you work for a gallery, !!! which one !!
you just made me $500 , i am with an art client and he needed proof on the art forgery market and that it is stalked to keep out basic, and i mean basic info ! thanks a million for the $500 !!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TZppXXsLUw
i am going to do it again, and if someone else pings it on Art forgery John Myatt i am going to get another $500
but if you ping it i only get $100
- Sorry, I do not work for a gallery. If you left a message because of the reversion of your additions on the article Art forgery, then see my message on your talk page. Thanks. -Liancetalk/contribs 14:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
so why cany you link the two biggest forgers in the 20th and 21st centurt. because you do work for a gallery, i pinged your IP
and when you did take out the what i put in, it truly shows the one sided edits.... take a look at the truth...who are ther biggest Wolfgang Beltracchi who has a PAGE AND IS REFERECED BUT YOU CANT CROSS REFERECE! AND YOU SPAMMED IT TOO QUICK.. BUT YOU DID MAKE ME A $1,000 SO I WANT TO SAY THANKS FOR THE $1,000
[[File:US-$1000-FRN-1918-Fr-1133d.jpg|thumb|who ever you are A $1,000
- Please stop this nonsense, it is obvious that you are not here to create an encyclopedia. Doing this further may result in an IP block. -Liancetalk/contribs 21:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Jarrod Moses
You declined the sandbox version of Draft:Jarrod Moses, saying that it already exists in Wikipedia. I don't see an article on this businessman. The existing draft has problems, but please let me know why you said it was duplicated. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hello. According to the deletion log of the article Jarrod Moses, it seems that it has been deleted beforehand so I believe that, when I searched for "Jarrod Moses", the article was still live on the article namespace. If I made any mistakes, please respond and tell me what I did wrong! -Liancetalk/contribs 16:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Checking the logs, the article was moved after I marked the draft as a duplicate. -Liancetalk/contribs 16:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you. In any case, the article needs improvement. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
VSAA page
My name is the TheMasterLlama. I am an editor of Wikipedia, and was recently editing the VSAA page. I made many additions, but my brother put "John Cena" for the principal. Please change all other arrangements back. TheMasterLlama (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Origination of Free Bet Blackjack
Liance,
I received your message regarding the removal of my update to the Mirage page regarding Free Bet Blackjack.
You can check out this page (http://www.downloadblackjack.com/free-bet-blackjack-casinos/) to see that the first Free Bet Blackjack table in Vegas was at the Golden Nugget. I can also personally confirm that, as I started playing Free Bet Blackjack at the Golden Nugget in August, 2012. Free Bet Blackjack was installed at the Mirage as the second Vegas location, with many more that have since followed.
Actually, if you read the source that is cited (http://thepogg.com/thepogg-interviews-geoff-hall-creator-of-blackjack-switch/), Geoff is actually quoted as saying "I will actually be in Vegas from November 25th - December 16th training and installing my new 'Free Bet Blackjack' game into The Mirage and Casino Royale, following an excellent trial at The Golden Nugget." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhinoman7 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
I will leave it up to you to correct this on the Mirage page.
Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhinoman7 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shifting Landscapes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henderson Bridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion
I would like the pages to be deleted immediately I did the wrong thing.
Liance Thank you for your assistance.
Liance this is my first Wiki entry for a full article and I am still getting a feel for how it works. This person I am trying to add to the Wikipedia is a football executive since 2002 and is currently with one of the top Serie A professional Football Clubs in Italy. There is so much material on him that I will take a few days to sift through it all. I am unclear what the difference is between references and external references. Be patient with me because if I do get a handle on this Wikipedia editing then I think I can become very passionate about contributing to the project. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11lionsd (talk • contribs) 23:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mega Jump App Icon.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Mega Jump App Icon.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MegaJump Gameplay.png
Thanks for uploading File:MegaJump Gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Gardetto's Page Edit
Hello,
I made my first edit on the "Gardetto's" page based on a package I had purchased yesterday.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gardetto's_Special_Request_Roasted_Garlic_Rye_Chips.jpg
Thank you,
Timothy
Xamen7 (talk) 18:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xamen7 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Speedy declined
I have declined your speedy on /Eulerian-Evolution-Lie-Bracket-Diffeomorphism-Group-CA, because WP:CSD#A1 is only for "very short" articles, which this is not. Certainly it needs an introductory section and a better title, but it is not a speedy candidate. I have moved it to Draft:Eulerian-Evolution-Lie-Bracket-Diffeomorphism-Group-CA. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Art Forgery, great job==
— Preceding unsigned comment added by YOU JUST MADE ME 10G (talk • contribs) 15:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- Lol, nice try. One more time and I'm reporting you. -Liancetalk/contribs 16:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
- No worries they are already blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Everything alright?
Your userpage popped up on my watchlist saying that you flagged it for speedy deletion. Is everything alright? Altamel (talk) 17:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, everything's alright. Just wanted to remove my userpage (for now) because it's really not necessary. Thank you so much for checking on me! You're an amazing Wikipedian :) -Liancetalk/contribs 19:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Really?
Is there any particular reason you reverted my edits, and restored vandalism? Boomer VialHolla 20:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
- Aw fuck, sorry about that. I didn't check the text I was restoring. I thought it was just another IP blanking they page. Thanks for catching that for me. Boomer VialHolla 20:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mega Jump (February 12)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mega Jump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Liance,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
|
Request on 12:01:31, 16 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 11lionsd
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Sandro_Mencucci&oldid=705160426
Thank you for reviewing my article. It has been rejected based on the assumption that I have not utilized reliable sources. I have quoted sources such as reputable newspapers such as the New York Times, Corriere della Sera, La Repubblica, La Nazione where Sandro Mencucci is referenced notably and indisputably as the CEO (amministratore delegato AD in Italian) of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club. I have referenced the federations and governing bodies of the football world such as FIFA, FIGC as well as other reputable calcio websites such as transfer market, calcio mercato as well as the ACF Fiorentina website Viola Channel and ACF Fiorentina Wikipedia page all in which Sandro Mencucci is identified as the CEO (amministratore delagato in Italian) of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club since the Della Valle era 2002. When I have referenced outside organizations such as Save the Children, Pune City FC or NorCal Premier League, CalcioDonne I have referenced those organizations websites directly where they identify Sandro Mencucci as the CEO (amministratore delegato AD in Italian) of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club. In addition to this, I have listed 19 published books with valid ISBNs who speak about Football in Italy and the club ACF Fiorentina and its history and contributions to the world of Football and they all specifically reference Sandro Mencucci as the CEO (amministratore delegato AD in Italian)of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club since the Della Valle era 2002.
Other than to use reputable newspapers, national and international authorities and governing bodies in the world of Football, and published books on the topic of contemporary ACF Fiorentina as a valid organization to validate the existence and contribution of its 13 year Football manager Sandro Mencucci I am only left to understand that the issue with all due respect to the reviewer who has ample experience in libraries, that perhaps the issue is a language barrier. Perhaps the fact that with the exception of the New York Times articles and the FIFA, FIGC, Save the Children, NorCal Premiere League Viola Channel and Transfer Market, the majority of these references are from notable authors and journals but are written in Italian. If the reviewer is not familiar with the resources and their importance to Italy and to the world of Football (i.e. FIFA) then I would like to request that someone with ample knowledge of these international governing bodies and who has sufficient knowledge of Italian review my resources. Thank you. 11lionsd (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
11lionsd (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, I see that you've resubmitted the draft of your article. You've added many more reliable sources since I first reviewed the page, and that's good. Some of the sources are still not independent and reliable (such as the Wikipedia article and the PDF hosted on Dropbox), but many more have been added. I recommend that you wait for another editor the review the article, and see what they say about what you need to improve on. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia; your contributions are appreciated! -Liancetalk/contribs 17:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
11lionsd (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
- hello! I have been working on your suggestions. Once I have a better understanding of how Wikipedia works, I will start expanding to other articles. It is a very interesting and stimulating project. Thank you again for all your help ! -Liancetalk/contribs 11:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar |
| Greetings Derp-nerds:from Derpking154 (talk) 13:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC) |
Misplaced message
Did not claim I own the Wikipedia page for The Romantics, I want to correct and update the information. I am Mike Skill of The Romantics, Original and current member of the band and agents and managers are tired of seeing the old/un-corrected info on The Romantics on Wikipedia and have requested we update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allmusic4u (talk • contribs) 06:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Request on 20:26:36, 23 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by BePoTech
I need assistance because this is the least user-friendly website when trying to create a simple page about a company the the assistance I've received has not helped me at all. I originally created my account with username "BePowerTech" then when I tried to create a page called "Be Power Tech" I was told the username and page name cannot be the same. So today I created a new username "BePoTech" and tried to create a page and received the following feedback:
Although warned both about COI and your username, you've continued to edit the article in your sandbox, and it appears that you submitted your sandbox for reviewing. There are a couple of problems here. First, you still need to change your username and to declare your conflict of interest. The information is all in the original COI information that I placed here. Second, when submitted to AfC for review, a sandbox is supposed to become a draft article. Why that sometimes does not happen I do not know, but it does. I could copy it to draft space, but I will not do so while you are editing in violation of the COI and namespace policies. You need to say what your relationship is with the company, and you need to change your username. LaMona (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
I started with a blank page today so for LaMona to tell me that I "continued to edit my article in my sandbox" is not true. If I knew how to fix my namespace problem I obviously would have done so. LaMona is not giving clear enough direction on how to fix this problem. Regarding the COI issue, I will work to resolve this.
Can you please help me with this namespace problem so that I can continue to work on this page and resolve the COI problem? If there is a phone number I can call that would be great because so far this "talk" option has only caused me more frustration.
BePoTech (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
BePoTech (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your patience!
|
XD In wkpd (talk) 14:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
18:49:09, 24 February 2016 review of submission by S1462065
I would like to ask how should i fix my article?
Request on 04:49:30, 25 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Dhanakkad Seth
because I do not exactly follow your advice.
Kindly suggest practical ways for improving the article. Does it need more references?
`````````````` `````````````````````` ```````````````````` ````````````````` Dhanakkad Seth (talk) 04:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
One of your draft reviews
For your future reference, your review of Draft:Luke John Burrows (which I've just deleted as an attack page) was completely inadequate (you simply reviewed it as lacking context). You need to take the time to ensure you're properly reviewing pages likes this one, as attack pages are considered something that needs immediate attention from administrators (whether in or outside of the draft space). Thank you, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention and didn't notice it was an attack page. It's my fault, sorry! I promise to be more careful in the future. -Liancetalk/contribs 15:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Misplaced message
Hello Liance,
This is Landsend35. I do not understand the statement that the KVH Industries article has no inline citations. I see 27 citations. I have re read all the live links about notability, independence, and reliability and I am unclear why the sources listed in the footnotes supplied do not qualify. Many thanks for all your help.
Landsend35 (talk) 16:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
KVH question inline citations
Hi, regarding rejection of the KVH sources, then, is this a formatting issue or a content issue? If I reformat the footnotes so they are highlighted and linked, is that acceptable? Many thanks. Landsend35 (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Misplaced message
Hi Lance,
I appreciate your comments and reviews. I have updated Jaleel Khan bio with new citations. Currently wikipedia has reference to this person - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijayawada_West_%28Assembly_constituency%29
Please review my post and comment.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istiaquem (talk • contribs) 06:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
WikiCup 2015 March newsletter
.jpg)
That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.
Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by 
Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by 
MPJ-DK (submissions), 
Hurricanehink (submissions), 
12george1 (submissions), and 
Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by 
Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with 
J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.
If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
18:32:38, 1 March 2016 review of submission by Holowiki
Hi Liance,
Thank you for looking over everything! Which links do you mean - the additional links at the bottom? Do you recommend just adding all of those as references instead of additional sources? Please let me know what I should improve upon/remove as we would love to publish this page as soon as possible.
Thank you again!
22:19:59, 1 March 2016 review of submission by Holowiki
Hi Liance,
I made those link changes, can you kindly review. I just want to make sure that the page is ok before I resubmit. I appreciate your help!
Thank you, Len
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)