Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.
Some of the people, places or things you have written about may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, all users are entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects.--Andeh 09:44, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is important that subjects are notable, otherwise they are not appropriate for the encyclopedia.--Andeh 09:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Xzibit 1024.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thanks for uploading Image:Xzibit_1024x768.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image copyright problem with Image:Lachlan_MC.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lachlan_MC.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Xplicit.JPG has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.
If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.
If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Erechtheus 14:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently re-created the article Xplicit, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- lucasbfrtalk 18:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have recently re-created the article Xplicit, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Please be aware that the continued re-creation of this content will not be tolerated and may lead to your account being blocked. Erechtheus 02:04, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Xplicit (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have vandalized two user pages, in addition to recreating a deleted article. The next time you vandalize or recreate a deleted article you will be blocked. Academic Challenger 02:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Academic Challenger 03:02, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as G-Unit Australia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Kinut/c 15:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Notorious ALI, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Maxamegalon2000 06:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but when you added the hangon tag you also removed the speedy deletion tag. --Maxamegalon2000 06:45, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Notorious ALI, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Notorious ALI. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Kinut/c 20:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Kinut/c 16:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop changing website links, especially under edit summaries that do not correspond to the actual change. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — TKD::Talk 11:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Notorious ALI, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 04:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because he fails the notability criteria of WP:MUSIC and the verifiability criteria of WP:V; because the article was previously deleted by consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notorious ALI, and because you keep reposting the article. NawlinWiki 16:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:Kinu. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. Kurutalk 03:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. This block will expire in one week. --Kinut/c 05:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Notorious ali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn 11:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not assert the notability of the subject. If there are sources, please tag with {{hangon}} and provide them. J Milburn 12:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lyrics are utterly meaningless. I could have 'my' lyrics all over the web by the end of the day, they are mostly user submitted, and all the sites copy off one another anyway. Multiple, verifiable, third party, reliable, non trivial sources are needed, not a load of dodgy sites posting lyrics. J Milburn 12:08, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You are the one who has recreated it and tried to defend it, I guessed you cared. Oh well, it will no doubt be deleted soon. J Milburn 12:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It is not a matter of whether he is real, it is a matter of whether he is notable. If you want people to believe you, why not provide sources? Wikipedia works by relying on sources, not 'believing' and 'not believing' what other editors write. J Milburn 12:21, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
With regards to your comments on User talk:J Milburn: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. J Milburn 10:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Picaroon9288. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ROASTYTOAST 00:56, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
You have been blocked from editing for 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued vandalism and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kurutalk 01:01, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your account has very few constructive contributions. You have been given an adequate number of warnings, and blocks upon blocks have been ignored. Please consider the consequences of your actions carefully. If you vandalize again after the expiration of your current block, an administrator may choose to block your account indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. Be careful. --Kinut/c 23:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.
Please do not make racist comments towards other users, as you did at User:Picaroon9288. Wikipedia has a strict 'no personal attacks' policy. Users who continue to be racist towards other users will be blocked. --U.S.A. cubed 01:00, 6 May 2007 (UTC)