User talk:Krish!/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Help

This user Krimuk90 is harassing me, asking for discuss first and removing alll my eduts. He himself does not discuss before changing. He is biased to his favourite actresses and I can prove. Please help me delegates as this user is constantly harassing me. When I pointed his biasness on talk page, he started disturbing me. Pls, do something.—Prashant 04:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

There is no point in being a damsel in distress. I have started discussions in talk page for every edit that is deemed controversial. If you have sources to prove I am wrong, discuss there and do not waste the time of admins. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

You always do the same thing which is proving me wrong. Just wait the time when I blast you here on Wikipedia and then we will talk.—Prashant 04:32, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

IndianBio, Vensatry, Dr. Blofeld, please look at the personal attacks here. Any suggestions on how to deal with this constant ownership of articles and attacks directed towards me? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I am not attacking you but I want to know the reason as Why you dont say anything when we talk nicely to each other. But, when we star fighting you suddenly becomeangry and start pointing defect in my writing? Tell me here.—Prashant 04:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Really, this edit summary is not an attack? -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:39, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

And, laughing at my english is not an attack? Wowww. I meant by that edit as why you are pasting that template? If you really want to improve the article, why dont you edit and make it neutral. You see that is not neutral, I see your article written from partial point of view. But, I didnot tagged that template.—Prashant 04:43, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

It's for you to improve it, per WP:BURDEN. Also, instead of making these passive aggressive attacks you can reply on the talk page, where I have started a discussion. Also, it's not my point-of-view that matters here. I have provided a source in talk page that proves the article is not neutral.-- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:57, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

60-70% positive review and rest mixed means generally well received. So, there is nothing controversial there. The film has also received 5 and 4 stars and rest 2.5 stars which means overall positive. Mixed if it had received only 2.5. So, pls im not interested. Also, I am leaving wikipedia when I get Chopra's award list to FL. So dont worry. You wont have a problem.—Prashant 05:03, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

The review roundup explicitly mentions that it received "mixed reviews" and provides a long list of them. Not for us to make-up statistics. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 05:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I once questioned Kubaan's review which is just like this and Dreamz said what I said to you. That roudup was done before many reviews were not even published. IB Times said HNY received mixed reviews which means MK is similar to MK? Really? Ask critics and not me.—Prashant 05:08, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

That made zero sense. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 05:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, Its actually good to discuss everything before adding to articles. But, seeking permission even for changing a word or structure is very tiring. I like discussing but not these kinds of stuffs.—Prashant 05:12, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

If you did like discussing, you would erm, discuss, and not make aggressive attacks towards me. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 05:14, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Right. But in this case generally well received is the consensus. What's say?—Prashant 05:16, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Not really, the film received mixed reviews like Happy New Year, and was not generally well received. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 05:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

1 - 5 stars 10-12-4 Stars 4-5---3.5 stars 5-6-3 stars Others-2.5 stars====generally well-received.—Prashant 05:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Not for us to decide. Majority of reviewers gave it less than 3 or 2.5 stars which in no way is well-received, as per the review roundup. KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I agree with Krimuk. Majority of the reviewers have given it 2-3 stars and even some have added negative reviews about the film in fact going through some reviews, the titles of the source reveal it all (negative titles) [1] [2] [3] [4] and many more. So it can be described as "mixed", but not "positive". Films like Queen and Haider can be called "positive" but not MK. --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 18:35, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

And, Krimuk is the best editor in the world according to you. Right? Why I am not surprised by this? A loyal fan!! And, the reviews which are currently present in the reception section are what? They are 4-5 stars. India Today has published 5 reviews, which does not make sense. So, please stop it.—Prashant 18:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Even a film has got a 60 % positive and 40 % mixed (here is the case). Its overall positive. Mixed means only 2.5 stars by all critics. So, pls dont show that you know everything.—Prashant 18:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I am not saying that Krimuk is the best editor in the world. I am just agreeing to him as he has a point here. I am not trying to show that I know everything either. But I am trying to say that we should keep our perspectives (+ve or -ve) at a side and should get neutral to the article. After reading the para, I must say that you have cherry picked the reviews. --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 18:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I havent. There are still some 3-3.5 stars and few 4 stars reviews which I have not added like some Star Box Office, RadioFM, Headlines Today, Zee News, MenXP, Aaj Tak etc. Its always like starting from best reviews and ending with negative ones. First try to learn what is difference between a mixed and negative review. I know the mixed one are less but, I havent edited the article since a long time. It still not ready by any means. I still have to add few more mixed reviews. So, please be neutral. If you really care about neutrality, you never pointed a finger at Krimuk for showing biasness as noted on PC's talk page.—Prashant 18:58, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

And what about the review that has been awarded 2 [5]. It should start with the best and end with the worst, which I think is this one or any other (which Idk). --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 19:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

One more thing! I am not pointing finger at you and if you are not willing me to be here, so it's okay I won't be here. Anyways all the best! Hope it achieves what you want it to. --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 19:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

I am definitely not saying that you should go from my page. I think you are a nice editor and neutral too. The only thing I dont like is that you are just following what Krimuk said. That's all.—Prashant 19:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Your difference of opinions with Krimuk is taking a ugly turn day by day. Both of you are really fighting like cocks in a cock fight. Do you realize that this may lead any one or both of you to be blocked? Cant you afford a full stop for this? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Pavanjandhyala, I am trying my best to resolve this issue but this user is not listening. First he said provide a source and when I provided, he says it's unneccessary. So, tell me what to do?—Prashant 14:45, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Stop talking with Krimuk. When you and Krimuk argue for so simple things, it looks like two kids are fighting, which is very harmful for you both and at times considered disruptive. If you want to change something in an article but others disagree with the change, the best way to get consensus is start an WP:RfC instead of arguing like small kids. If you need any help, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Regards, Jim Carter 17:59, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, Its my fault but, he's manipulative. I dont resist partiality in articles. I was trying to stop this discussion. But, he wasn't. I really dont want to interact with him and will definitely avoid. He should not cross my path as he makes editing a pathtic experience once he start attacking someone.—Prashant 18:05, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Stop, even discussing about him here if you really want to stop it. Your above comment here is also a critisism of his action. Do not talk to him, do not talk about him (I'll also suggest this to Krimuk if he is following this discussion). Recently, two editors were blocked for 48 hours after a similar incident. I don't want to see you both get blocked. So, I suggest you both not to talk with each other. Consider this an advice from an admin. Best, Jim Carter 18:35, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for showing kindness to me as no one does. I will follow your word.—Prashant 18:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Mary Kom (film)

Hi - I have copy-edited the latest additions to that page. I had to rewrite the passage on Chopra's prosthetic hair - I felt it was a little awkwardly-worded and too closely followed the source material, but I hope it still conveys the same information. Otherwise I've just tidied up and repaired a broken reference tag.

Now I want to actually see the film! LS1979 (talk) 16:38, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Help

.This user User:IndianBio is harassing me. He is reverting every edits without ant reasons. Administrator please tell him to stay away from me as I have no interest in him. Another editor had already asnwered his query regarding copyvio saying "he did not saw any". Still he is doing of his own. Please save me.—Prashant 14:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

While there are obviously some disagreement between you and IndianBio, I see no evidence of harassment. IndianBio usually provides reasons for his reverts in his edit summaries. If you disagree with the reasons he provides, that should be discussed on the article talk page. Huon (talk) 23:48, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Harassment from IndianBio

Please protect me from this awful editor, who is constantly taking on me and is humiliatin me. This user is reverting my edits without seeing the reliable sources like his revert on Mary Kom (film). His last two edits will tell you that I was right and he was wrong. But, without asking me he reverted my edit. I want to know why? He's after me? I don t even see what he is doing and dont even want to. He suddenly generates a interest in the same article, on which i satart my work. He has a problem to show his intelligency and get rewarded. He should be ashamed of himself. Please, Admistrator tell him to keep a distance of at least 100 articles from me. It is very disturbing and exhausting.—Prashant 17:02, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

This question was already answered by Huon a few days ago. If you cannot reach agreement among the interested editors on the article talk page, then you should read the Wikipedia procedures for dispute resolution. However further use of the {{help me}} template on this issue would be inappropriate. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  (User:Wtwilson3)  — 18:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Kaminey

Hey bro, you want me to review the article for GA? Ssven2 (talk) 10:58, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

• I've reviewed it here. On hold until November 22nd. Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Hey bro, good news. Kaminey has passed its GA review. Ssven2 (talk) 08:25, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For making Kaminey a GA, and correcting all mistakes from its previous GA review. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:02, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!!

Hello Prashant!, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Happy editing, —Ssven2 speak 2 me 04:51, 19 December 2014 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Thank you very much. Wishing you the same.—Prashant 17:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year Prashant!!

Happy New Year!

Prashant!,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. — Ssven2 ^{speak 2 me} 07:51, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	For your work on Chopra related articles. Hope you continue with your amazing work. Don't be sad if one disagrees with your point. It goes on FrankBoy (Buzz) 19:28, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you FrB.TG. I dont think I can continue work here. After her awards list it seems difficult as my Engineering subjects are getting tougher day by day. So, Ill focus on that as I cant cope with the hate and constant criticism about my poor english and working on Chopra's articles. At one time, I wrote 4-5 GAs back to back in a month but, after the constant hate from wikipedian user, I have not written a single article. So, you can think what it means because when environment is against you, you cannot do much. And, thanks again!—Prashant 13:59, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Nobody is against you. It's just that you sometimes get a little bit possessive regarding your work, which leads to disagreement or in your words "hatred". Don't get upset and see what others say and of course try to prove your point if you think your point justifies your claim. I am sure that everyone (excluding some, according to you) appreciates your work. As for the poor English, I can bet many are alike. Despite not being in a native level, you have two featured contents and so many GAs, which I think is quite an achievement. Wikipedia can't afford to loose a user like you. Hope you can stay. :) --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 17:09, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Unrelated note: I have made some changes here. Hope you like it. :) --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 19:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Yeah! Thanks for that. Coming to your previous post, I think It's very shameful that some users are interpreting things for their favorites on wikipedia, which is injustice to some of the articles. Like Chopra's. See this "Kangana was praised like Vidya for carrying a film on her shoulders especially Queen!" Chopra too has two films.on her shoulders like Fashion and Mary Kom. But, I dont think media only gives credit to Vidya and Kangana only. So tell me am I wrong if I point a finger towards this? Chopra too has been given credits for her contribution to indian cinema, which doesnt show in her article. The fact is one respected user is misinterpreting things to show his hatred towards Chopra. I dont care if anyone dont like her but, if her article is affected beacuse of that hate. I will protest, No matter anyone takes my side. Also, The kind of opening MK took was brilliant unlike Kahaani and Queen, which sustained on word of mouth. But, MK was doing great business from day one as compared to initail dismal performance of these two films. So, this should be mentioned about her contribution. But, I know it wont.—Prashant 08:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

I think that you should provide a couple of sources (more than one) which says whatever you want to add and then there shouldn't be any objection. --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 18:54, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

FrB.TG I have provided many sources but look at his reaction. So, he wont even accept the souces. What to do?—Prashant 07:12, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

I am glad that your issues are finally resolved but unfortunately Krimuk has left Wikipedia. --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 11:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

No! I don't think so. He will soon come back.—Prashant 11:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Good if so. Hope that you stay too as you once decided to leave the community. And good to have a dedicating user like you :) --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 11:58, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, I really don't know if I'm going to stay here. I only said that after the list of Chopra will pass its FL. Then, I can decide if I will remain here.—Prashant 12:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

All the best! And do let me know if I can give you (any kind of) help! I will be happy to help you. --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 14:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for saying that. I will definitely take your help.—Prashant 14:20, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

I love your work!!

Hi there,

I must say, your an great editor to Wikipedia! I wish I could learn it like you. Your an always on top of editing you liked pages...I think that's amazing! Your work is very very IMPRESSIVE!!!

I wish you could take charge of editing Kareena Kapoor's page like the way you do your other Wikipedia pages! Her winning awards and nominations page needs lots of up-to-date edition. Kareena Kapoor's Wikipedia page needs an editior like you who is just fantastic!

Please do look into my suggestions!

Truly,

Sam! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.121.195.138 (talk) 19:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, I dont think Kareena Kapoor's article need any work to do because it is brilliantly written. Coming to her awards list, well maybe I could that one to work but, I am busy with Priyanka Chopra awards list. Also, only I know what it goes into in finding sources for Bollywood lists. It's very hard to search. Well, lets see where it goes.—Prashant 02:40, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran PR

Do let me know if you are interested in commenting at the PR. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Sargun Mehta/archive1

I've opened a PR for an article, and need some suggestions. So if you've time then please leave your comments here. :) Hetika (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Priyanka Chopra filmography

Hi. Hope you're well. I noticed you changed my edit on this article. I thought I should try to fully explain the edit as I can see how it could be seen as major.

• 1) Details about the film itself are best suited for the film's article and not Chopra's bio so Fashion being "women-centric" is not relevant.
• 2) For her role in Barfi, we can't use single reviews as it becomes a POV issue especially if the claim that it was one of the finest, on the same token someone could add a negative review of her performance and claim that describes how her performance was viewed widely which you would agree would be wrong. If you can find a source where many critics thought it was one of the finest performances in Indian cinema then there is justification for it to be present.
• 3) We can use awards/ nominations as a way of expressing that the performance was appreciated instead of reviews.
• 4) Mentioning that Barfi was sent to the Oscars is also not needed as she's not a producer of the film.
• 5) Krrish being a major box office phenomenon needs a ref.
• 6) The unsourced claim of Mary Kom being a critical success is not relevant, should only focus on how her performance was perceived.
• 7) I had changed the main picture to one that is film related from the same time period as it is an article about her films not her promotions.
• 8) Others were just copyedits.

Cowlibob (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, the review for Barfi! was added during its flc on reviewers request. I can understand but, I think it should be left the way it passed FL. Though, I must say your edits were impressive. But, I will still prefer the earlier one. In between, would you show up on the flc, which you left?—Prashant 15:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

PC's awards list

Hi Prashant.

Love your work on Wiki. Just saw you removed PC's Bollywood Hungama awards table from her page. I understand u did that because of the fl nomination but why don't you add those awards in the other awards table. The same has been done in Vidya Balan's awards page. They didnt remove the Bollywood hungama awards, just added them in the other awards category. Is that possible?

Keep up the good work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.41.41.82 (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Help

I would like to request the checkuser to check ASAP as I have my exams. My flc is pending and this user Krimuk90, who is a drama creator, having a gala time framing me with no proof. Please, check fast. Here, some cowards talk through e-mail and plan to get down others. I want to ask if you are very positive and honest why don't you say directly. Hypocrisy! These kind of users should be ashamed of themselves and their face should be blackened to show how much they are........—Prashant 10:04, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Prashant, this is not the right way to use a {{helpme}} tag. There are only so many hours in the day, and Wikipedia admins are all volunteers, so the SPI will be looked at in due time. Forcing the issue will do you no favours. Primefac (talk) 10:24, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

What about framing an innocent user for personal reasons? This user is an expert in this. I have my flc going on and my exams are also coming near. And, you are saying this.—Prashant 10:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Which is more important: a website that you can come back to at any time, or exams you will only have one chance in your life to take ? --Shirt58 (talk) 03:36, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Well that's my semester exam thats it.—Prashant 03:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	I really appreciate how you handle the hate from that useless user. Keep up your good work at Wiki and hope your exams are going great. Study well mate. Daan0001 (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For bringing Priyanka Chopra's accolades page to FL status, despite several obstacles and the fact that you were the sole nominator. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Kailash. Yay!—Prashant 07:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations on PC's FLC! Your hard work on it has finally paid off. BTW, which course in Engineering are you doing? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! Well, I'm pursuing B.Tech degree in Electrical Engineering.—Prashant 08:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Govindudu Andarivadele

Would you like to conduct a GAR on this article? Let me know if you are interested in doing so or not. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

I posted that message almost ten days back and no reply till now and you've been active since these ten days. Hence i assume that you are not at all interested to take up a GAR of this article. Sorry for troubling you. Regards, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

@Pavanjandhyala: Sorry buddy, I didn't saw your message. I don't check my talk page message and since, the last few days, there were several notifications which includes my article (created) was linked with this that and blah blah and other thanking me. So, I didn't observed your message in between. Okay, Let me check the article.—Prashant 15:54, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I cannot review as I am not familiar with the topics and don't have much time (as of April-May 11) due to my forthcoming exams which includes my 4th semester and few regular tests, and I have to comple my lab assignments and then, Viva. If you can wait till May, then I would review in a day. Also, I'm only focusing on the FLC and my other articles are on hold. I hope you can understand. All the best!—Prashant 16:06, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

I understand, and also would like to add that mine too is more or less the same situation. Thus leave this one. When i expand and get c/ed my favorite film-related article to get reviewed for GA status, i shall approach you sometime in mid May 2015, and i hope you will review this one for sure. Good luck for your ongoing endeavours! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah for sure. I will review your article whenever you say. Just notify me. Thanks! Would you like to give my input to my flc? I will appreciate it. Thanks!—Prashant 16:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Looks good. Though i secured nine GA successes in a row, i am not worthy of giving inputs in this case and may mess up things there. Anyways, thanks for asking and hope your flc wins. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Forgot to say this. This article became a GA recently and is my tenth consecutive GA success. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran FAC 2.0

Would you like to make any comments at the article's 2nd FAC? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

@Ssven2: I was not aware that it has been already nominated, otherwise I would have added (I don't search other contributions). I will definitely put some comments (if neccessary). I have to read it completely. So, I will put my words tommorrow as I'm preparing for my test (easy paper).—Prashant 13:34, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

By god's grace, it has already garnered 5 supports BTW. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:45, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

I think it has garnered supports because of your's and Kailash's hard work.—Prashant 13:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

A gentle reminder. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 12:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, I was reading that article and was going to post on the FAC page But, you pinged me before I finished. Yhe article is nicely written and I didn't found any problems. It has my support.—Prashant 13:04, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Guys, if you don't mind, can you say at least how many editors should support the article to become an FA? I ask this because i read the message by Ssven2 on 15 April saying "5 supporters". Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. If your article is bang on and has only two supports, it will pass for sure. The content matters and not supports.—Prashant 13:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay. Let me wait till the final fate is decided. For now, just like his evilness himself, i'm waiting the article to reach FA status. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra

Hello! Your submission of List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cowlibob (talk) 16:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Congrats and sorry

Hi Prashant! Many congratulations on PC trilogy. Sorry that I couldn't get to the FLC. Anyways I am happy that the article finally acheived what you wanted it to. :) -- FrankBoy _CHITCHAT 14:49, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Parineeti Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Film Award. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Kaminey

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of accolades received by Kaminey, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ovguide.com/kaminey-the-scoundrels-9202a8c04000641f8000000009d4e47a.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra

Great job on the list. I've posted a few comments here and i hope you shall either rectify them or give an explanation regarding them. Good luck! And forgive me if i am not eligible for commenting there. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Enthiran - First Superstar FA!

Great news! Enthiran is promoted! My first FA success! Hooray! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 13:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra

Thanks Victuallers (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For bringing List of awards and nominations received by Parineeti Chopra to FL status. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:38, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

@Pavanjandhyala: Thank you! (for the star and your inputs). Yay!—Prashant 14:52, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome! Well, are you done with your exams? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:19, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Nopes. It has just started. Five more papers to go.......—Prashant 15:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

All the best man. See you later. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:22, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for List of accolades received by Kaminey

Harrias ^talk 18:36, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Meghan Trainor discography/archive1

Would you mind leaving some comments? Thanks, All About That Bass (A word?? / Stalking not allowed...) 05:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of accolades received by Kaminey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Financial Express. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 May 2015 (UTC)