User talk:Kreplach123

Ways to improve Anil Kumar Gain

Hi, I'm Ormr2014. Kreplach123, thanks for creating Anil Kumar Gain!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs more references, but otherwise a well-written article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 18:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks User talk:Ormr2014! This was my first attempt at writing an article, glad to know you find it well-written. I will try and find more references pertaining to Anil Kumar Gain soon. Kreplach123 (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Indian people page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Articles on surnames & Mahishya caste

It is ok to mention that Mahishyas use a particular surname if it is restricted to few castes like you have mentioned in the article on Das surname; but it would be unfair & undue if you mention the same in an article on a surname used by all major Bengali castes like Biswas and Bhowmick. I hope you understand. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 10:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

I understand. I was wondering the same. In that case, should those surnames' articles be left without mention of any caste ? I understand Biswas is going to be tough to categorized in terms of caste, but Bhowmick seems to be pretty restricted as a caste. From what I learnt, it is mostly used by Mahishyas, and some Gandhabaniks as well. I won't edit them anymore, but you could consider mentioning common castes that use those surnames in their respective articles. Thanks Ekdalian. Kreplach123 (talk) 11:27, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Yabberz

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Kreplach123, thanks for creating Yabberz!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 05:38, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Anil Kumar Gain.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anil Kumar Gain.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 14:49, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kaberi Gayen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kaberi Gayen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aashaa (talk) 23:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Swapan K. Gayen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapan K. Gayen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapan K. Gayen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:41, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Swapan K. Gayen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swapan K. Gayen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swapan K. Gayen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 06:12, 6 November 2020 (UTC)