User talk:Klofáč

Hello, you can talk here please.

July 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Czech koruna has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Czech koruna was changed by Klofáč (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.901258 on 2018-07-06T19:32:04+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the ČSNS.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the ČSNS.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Colour issue

You are not willing to seek consensus through discussion nor seem to be willing to stop your edit warring. This is problematic. You have now openly violated WP:3RR and you could be blocked in sight by any admin who passes-by. It was your call to engage in such disruptive editing. Impru20^talk 17:40, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

• Please, stop your reverts and ENGAGE-IN-DISCUSSION. Impru20^talk 17:42, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
  • I opened a discussion at Template talk:Ordinary People (Slovakia)/meta/color though you keep deliberately ignoring it. I won't be reverting any further because it is obvious you will keep reverting forever. I will wait for you to discuss the issue and seek a consensus for it. Otherwise, if in a couple days you have not done any of it, the previous light green colour shade will be restored. Have a nice day. Impru20^talk 17:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I've changed maps. --Klofáč (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

What has that to do with the fact that the colour you are trying to impose has no consensus? Can you stop your reckless editing and engage in discussion? I repeat: If you do not seek and obtain a consensus within the next couple days (I've opened TWO discussions and you are still unwilling to engage in any of them), I will restore the previous light green shade (the last one which had at least an implicit consensus) in all articles, charts and graphics. Your call. Impru20^talk 18:06, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

No shading need to be changed. This was restoration of old colour and update of party lack of other maps. If you want to changing anything you can change color of Freedom and Solidarity then. But it is older party good luck with that. If you won't change anything to have diverse colours then leave it like this. --Klofáč (talk) 18:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

What you did was plainly disruptive. The light green shade had been there for a lot of time, then you came and changed it all unilaterally even after being warned to seek a consensus and ignoring all of it! You are no one to ignore Wikipedia's WP:CONSENSUS policy. You can do one of two things: 1) Revert all of your changes to the light green shade, then seek a consensus for your proposed change and, if it succeeds, have the gray colour added without any lingering issue, or 2) Keeping ignoring me so that eventually the light green shade will be restored anyway and possibly administrative action should be taken against you for edit warring and violating WP:CONSENSUS in such an obvious way. That you like the new colour more is not enough of a reason to justify what you just did and to ignore Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Your call. Impru20^talk 18:13, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

There is no policy which could be violated by puting diverse coloring. Parties around the spectre even use to have contemporary colours. --Klofáč (talk) 18:19, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes, WP:CONSENSUS. And WP:3RR as well (which by now you would have noticed). Impru20^talk 18:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Template:Ordinary People (Slovakia)/meta/color. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Number 57 18:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as you continued making changes to related articles after the template was protected due to you exceeding 3RR. Number 57 18:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:International Democrat Union logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:International Democrat Union logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)