User talk:KirrVlad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, KirrVlad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Edgar181 12:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fernanda Seno[edit]

You posted the following to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fernanda seno:
"Sorry, I was unable to find the inexistent article's talk page. Nor do I know what a deletion review looks like or what the rules for posting there are. Please don't kick me out, I just wanted to express that the "we agree with the portuguese wikipedia! argument is no longer valid. She did exist, was a recognized, acclaimed and toponymical-ubiquitious poet, as the Portuguese and German wikipedias now acknowledge. So maybe someone could help me with the uphill effort of keep submitting(no other term for it) articles on Portuguese language poets only to see them deleted as vanity-something-or-other, which is almost funny as almost all of those I have tried to add to the English language wikipedia have been long dead. Post-mortem vanity? No such thing. Right?... —Preceding unsigned comment added by KirrVlad (talkcontribs) 13:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC) "[reply]

The deletion review process is described at Wikipedia:Deletion review, including steps to list a new deletion review. --Geniac (talk) 18:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Phil McGraw. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 16:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Sockpuppet[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Domaleixo‎. Thank you. Kman543210 (talk) 15:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Status of religious freedom by country, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I've redone your change re Portugal. The previously cited source was a dead link; I've replaced that with a live link and reconformed the article assertion to info in that source. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 21:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Edit Summaries[edit]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. - 220 of Borg 18:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All edits marked as minor?[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. - 220 of Borg 19:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

exclamation mark  Final 'nag', did you mean to put the text at the top of the Kellie Waymire page here? (I reverted your edit btw. ) - 220 of Borg 19:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ignatius of Loyola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Basque Country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of the first female holders of political offices in Europe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assembly of the Republic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administratively united parishes[edit]

Before you continue to alter civil parish names, please be aware that I will challenge those names. As much as the political name may include "União de freguesias", this is likely a temporary term. Until a final decision has been made by the IGP, there is no clear indication that those names are valid beyond the legality of the politico-administrative context. As you should be aware, most of the freguesia articles refer to the geographic context and not the political alone. People are not going to be using that affectation when referring to merged regions: these civil parishes will continue to exist as separate geographic areas, even if the political evolution continue. Since the IGP is the arbitrator of geographic context, the use of União de freguesia in article namespaces implies a subject matter that does not exist. I realize that Wikipedia PT has not arbitrated on this subject (and they themselves do not arbitrate on Wikipedia EN), but it is premature to start creating long-winded names, when they will likely change with the IGP ruling. Even then, Wikipedia EN (and I refer you to Wikipedia:Article titles) states that article names should be natural, concise and consistent. Further, the intended creation of União de article names has the affect of creating non-existent pages or red-link pages for items that may never result in article in the foreseeable future. Regardless, I apologize for reverting in total, since changes to the presidents and party affiliations are naturally important to content (a bug exists in the Rollback functionality). Regarding this subject (administratively united parishes) I suggest continuing the conversation on Wikipedia:WikiProject Portuguese geography in the appropriate sub-heading. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.--Jetstreamer Talk 11:50, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oceanic climate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Portuguese in the United Kingdom[edit]

Hi. Thanks for your edits to Portuguese in the United Kingdom. Sometimes I feel like I'm the only editor maintaining most of those immigrant group articles, so it's good to get some help. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:55, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2010 Northern Hemisphere summer heat waves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebordelo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, KirrVlad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confidence and supply does not exist in Portugal, it is a non existing concept in non-Westminster governments[edit]

Furthermore it does not fit the agreements signed which include no guarantees or promises of either confidence or supply.

BRD[edit]

WP:BRD describes a general process that you in this edit [[1]] should have discussed - please read and in future is is polite to follow what it suggests. I am unsure of your reasoning for including the Azores and Medira in this list - the list is horrible enough and does not need every county's dependencies listed (unless perhaps if their dependencies are in a different hemisphere to the "home" territory). Andrewgprout (talk) 07:21, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, KirrVlad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of sovereign states by date of formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olivença (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and Lana Del Rey quote[edit]

Two issues:

  1. Please don't mark edits as "minor" unless no one could possibly object to what you are doing. It looks like you are marking every edit as minor.
  2. In this edit you changed a simple typo to a corruption of the actual quote. Please do not alter quotes to change the person's statement. If it is absolutely necessary because of a painful grammatical mistake (which it was not in this case) please notate that in square braces/brackets per the editorial standard.

If you have any questions please ping me here and let me know. Thanks. —DIYeditor (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, KirrVlad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]