User talk:KingdomScribe101

January 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Apollo Quiboloy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 14:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Apollo Quiboloy, you may be blocked from editing. Mako001 (C) (T) 15:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Kingdom of Jesus Christ (church). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please stick to what you have already been told here. If something about a section bothers you, consider discussing it with other authors on the talk page first, rather than just removing the entire section. Thanks -Killarnee (C•T•U) 02:22, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KingdomScribe101! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 02:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, KingdomScribe101. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Apollo Quiboloy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 15:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, in that case then you would be better off contacting this address mailto:info-en-q@wikipedia.org. They should be able to answer your questions. However I cannot see it as being clearly libellous, and it is quite likely that another editor will reinstate it shortly. Mako001 (C) (T) 15:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Mako001[edit]

Hello, Mako001. Unfortunately, I see that the edit that you persistently want to publish on the Apollo Quiboloy page is libelous content that unfairly harms a person's reputation. This is against Wikipedia guidelines. The guidelines specifically state: "It is the responsibility of all contributors to ensure that the material posted on Wikipedia is not defamatory."

My edits are definitely not a conflict of interest as you are trying to imply. All information I published on the page is factual — unlike the sources you are trying to cite which clearly are biased information.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:KingdomScribe101 reported by User:Killarnee (Result: ). Thank you. -Killarnee (C•T•U) 02:42, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To User:Killarnee: Adding potentially libelous content[edit]

January 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 03:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KingdomScribe101, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Mako001 (C) (T) 13:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KingdomScribe101. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]