User talk:Kemalava
Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Flores[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kim Flores requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 21:45, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Marco Fortuny (Ramp Model)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Marco Fortuny (Ramp Model) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 21:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Flores[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kim Flores requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Marco Fortuny (Ramp Model)[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Draft:Marco Fortuny (Ramp Model), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 04:08, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
August 2019[edit]
Hello, I'm Jeff G.. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ 15:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Marco Fortuny[edit]
Hello Kemalava,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Marco Fortuny for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
W42 23:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
The article Kim Flores has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Kim Flores[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kim Flores requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Marco Fortuny[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Marco Fortuny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:58, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. - Frood (talk!) 21:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. User:Ymblanter (talk) 22:34, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Nomination of Kim Flores for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kim Flores is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Flores until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 05:19, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kemalava, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Jalen Folf (talk) 13:47, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Kemalava (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Pls grant my request to unblock mehere for i have no intention to violate any rules here.. i was new and my ignorance in formatting my articles is the main reason why i made a lot of mistakes such as having multiple accounts on which I didn’t know that it was not allowed here.. Pls help me delete those accounts and create a new real one that i can use here. I promise not to create another account again for i have learned my lesson now. Hoping that i can be a big help here soon Kemalava (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Accounts cannot be deleted, only abandoned. Ideally, you should return to the very first account you used and request unblock from that account, which you would use henceforth if unblocked. When you make your request, you will need to list any and all other accounts you created, as well as describe the contributions you want to make. 331dot (talk) 17:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{unblock| As far as i know this is my first account the rest of my accounts i forgotten the password already... even if you check my login details now it took me 33 times before i got it right..
Kemalava (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I wanted to contribute thats the why i am here and I violated rules here in making multiple accounts. But I was new and I often got confused and mixed up on how wikipedia works and So with other wiki’s. Making one account from another is prohibited i know but believe me i have no intentions to break rules here.. my intention is as clear as everyone us here... i wouldn’t go and wait that far, patiently waiting for you to re-consider me... i know i can help soon i just have to learn more... this is one of the few things i love to do... thank you and pls reconsider
Decline reason:
You seem to be saying you lack sufficient competence to edit here, and this is why you set up six(!!!) separate accounts. That explains why we should leave you blocked, not why we should lift the block. It doesn't explain why you kept on doing so after your original account was blocked. You had to know that was inappropriate. Your talk pages are littered with warnings about your inappropriate actions, too. That makes it very clear your intention is not to learn from your mistakes but instead, to carry on, ignoring what people tell you, setting up new accounts so people don't see your previous warnings and blocks. Perhaps Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Given your history of abuse, WP:SO is an option for you. That requires six months with zero edits, then you'll need to explain what's changed, why we can be sure you are significantly more capable of following Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This will be hard, but if you build up a history of productive edits on other Wikipedia projects, this will count in your favour. Yamla (talk) 13:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock | i don't know how to convince you guys that i really learned from my mistakes esp when you blocked me..anyways ..No one wants to give me a chance to correct my mistakes.... i won't make an appeal for you wouldn't accept any comming from me.. Dont worry for this will be my Last Maybe contributing here is not really for me... Thank you, Godbless, and Keep it up!}
Kemalava (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is so unfair :( it is natural for some begginers like me to make a lot of adjustments same as mistakes also... Why don't you invistigate my account to see how many time i failed to logged in because of wrong log in infos for two years almost 100 times i failed to log in... and i bet u can see that to my alerts and notifs ... i cant open my account for many times and mso i decided to create some accounts but never did i violate any rules except that... i tried to contribute as much as i can.. i concentrated with my article with kim trying hard for your acceptance and i never gave up... i told myself that if i made it successful with my first article then that will ne the time i will allow myself to move and do another... I wasnt good as you guys but fair chance is what im asking
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.