User talk:Karnoff

October 2007[edit]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User talk:Proabivouac may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 05:49, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karnoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry if my contributions seemed like trolling. I want to know, how can I edit Adolf Hitler?

Decline reason:

You can't. The giant swastika picture on your user page kind of gave you away.— chaser - t 06:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That was only because I wanted to show that I want to edit articles related to Adolf Hitler.

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I am willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. PLease note that you Won't be able to edit Adolf Hitler for 4 days (because your account is new) and please don't post swastikas on your userpage or anywhere else again - it is seen as inflamatory. Also note that if you are lying (remember I am giving you the benefit of the doubt here) there is a good half a dozen people who will be watching and you will end up banned again. Viridae ^Talk 06:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: Viridae ^Talk 06:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks.

FYI, please sign your messages using four tildes (~~~~) - they will automatically turn into your name with a date stamp. --B 06:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Karnoff, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --B 06:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karnoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What did I do this time that warranted a block? All I did was edit a few controversial pages. On what grounds should I be blocked?

Decline reason:

You've been given plenty of chances; your edits are uniformly unconstructive and make it abundantly clear that you're not here to improve the encyclopedia. — MastCell ^Talk 22:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karnoff (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like another to check my contributions, give me specific edits that were disruptive, and possibly unblock me. The edits I've made to DESiegel's talk page were sensible; he may have left the project. And the other edits I made were far from disruptive. Calling this account a trolling-only account is false. In fact, I've never once trolled with the intention of trolling.

Decline reason:

reason — Checkuser-verified sock of User:Connell66. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 03:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And for the record, I haven't been given plenty of chances. In fact, I was pardoned by the benefit of the doubt. I honestly think I was being closely watched by sysops like El C, Krimpet or MastCell who were looking for any excuse whatsoever to block me. That's unfair. Karnoff 03:27, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And maybe if you specify which edits are unconstructive and why they were unconstructive, I can improve on them. Karnoff 03:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]