User talk:KanysLupys

Welcome!

Hello, KanysLupys, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Zoz (t) 22:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help at Complexometric titration. Please use the article's talk page for messages about the article's current state. Thanks. --Zoz (t) 22:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia. --Zoz (t) 22:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing uncited content[edit]

I am so incredibly disgusted with the Wikipedia moderators or whatever the hell you call them. I go out of my way to add a synthetic method for the production of bismuth tetroxide on the bismuth(III) oxide page and some waste of carbon atoms removed it for not having a reference. None of the other methods listed for making bismuth tetroxide had references!! This dude takes down the method I added but doesn't do anything with the other methods listed!! I didn't add the reference because Wikipedia makes it a massive pain in the ass to add them in. I still have not figured out exactly how to do it. But I am not going to bother finding out now. I went through the entire page and deleted EVERYTHING that didn't have a reference. And I have only just begun. I am going to make it my new mission in life to delete EVERYTHING from Wikipedia pages that don't have references. I will never again add anything to Wikipedia I will only take things away. Either EVERYONE has to give references for EVERYTHING or no one does!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by KanysLupys (talk • contribs)

@KanysLupys: I suggest taking a look at our verifiability policy for when removing uncited content is appropriate, more specifically it may be worth reading the essay on removal of uncited material. See also; WP:CITENEED and WP:REMOVAL. Let me know on my talk page if you have any questions ~ Chip 🐺 17:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm ChipWolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bismuth(III) oxide without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ Chip 🐺 17:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

I provided edit summaries! There are NO REFERENES for the information I removed! We have no way of knowing whether or not that information is true!— Preceding unsigned comment added by KanysLupys (talk • contribs)

@KanysLupys: I've provided a more detailed response on the topic of removing uncited material above ~ Chip 🐺 17:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Risk of a block[edit]

Please be careful. I also perceive that you are making the same removals with 35.133.211.113 (talk · contribs). See WP:SOCK for why this is a bad idea. If removals continue, your account may be indefinitely blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/KanysLupys, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

~ Chip 🐺 17:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet?!! >:-([edit]

IF YOU ARE GOING TO ENFORCE A RULE YOU NEED TO ENFORCE IT EQUALLY!!! I was not logged in when I made the first addition or the first removal!! I have had this account for OVER A DECADE!!! The whole reason you even have a complexometric titration page is because of me! That article was a stub when I found it!!! And I wouldn't be so damn upset if you just applied the rules evenly!!! You have no way of knowing if those other two synthetic methods that were already on the page are correct or not because they have NO REFERENCES! I can't even find the second one in the literature ANYWHERE and I have 2 degrees in chemistry! I teach chemistry at the local college here. I have a chemistry YouTube channel. I LIVE FOR CHEMISRY but I can't find any references for that second synthetic method for bismuth tetroxide ANYWHERE! But you have no problem with that method being on the page! Meanwhile I have actually DONE the reaction to produce bismuth tetroxide from potassium bismuthate! And maybe if you made it easy to add references to information more people would use them! The synthetic method I am talking about comes from the Handbook of Preparative Inorganic Chemistry by Georg Brauer, 1963, Academic Press, page 629! You can download it as a free ebook here: https://b-ok.cc/book/533123/3b75e9 You can WATCH me do the synthesis right here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHB2k790W9U&t=553s You want to delete my account? Go right ahead!! I have never been more disgusted with you people than I am now and I've been using this site for almost 15 years!! I will make sure to do everything legally within my power to turn off people from donating to you the next time you have your digital hand out begging for people to keep you afloat! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KanysLupys (talk • contribs)

Hi @KanysLupys:, as the sock notice above says; leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again. The WP:SOCK policy is taken very seriously, especially when editors use a sock for disruptive editing. You were initially warned for blanking content. I have provided the various materials and policies above which explain when unreferenced content should be removed from Wikipedia.

The age of your account and your expertise don't exempt you from our policies. Your edits were reverted following your comments above regarding your unconstructive intentions: I am going to make it my new mission in life to delete EVERYTHING from Wikipedia pages that don't have references. I will never again add anything to Wikipedia I will only take things away. Either EVERYONE has to give references for EVERYTHING or no one does!!!. If you wish to make constructive edits to Wikipedia that align with our purpose and our policies, you are welcome to ~ Chip 🐺 18:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing: This is a self-confessed parade example of "disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point".

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logged-out answer[edit]

Special:Diff/995574784... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:44, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]