User talk:KTVAAK
I should be unblocked because I have been trying to save a logo For KTVA that keeps being deleted off of Wikipedia. Over the years I have watched information, pictures and logos get deleted because some how they are no longer need in the history column. I have been trying to bring information back that has been being deleted every year. I know who founded KTVA but It never sticks because your administrators are then deleting the information that I just added. There has been information from KTVA’s Wikipedia page that has been deleted from information, pictures to now A logo that deserves to honored and shown somewhere on your KTVA’s Wikipedia page. I am not your problem your administrators are the problem and like it or not your company is letting your administrators get away with it. Your letting your administrators delete information, pictures and logo’s from your website that deserve to be recognized and honored. Your administrators are the real problem and they are the ones destroying your website. From the minute I logo on or create a account for a friend so I can edit your website and add back information, pictures, and logo, your company and administrators are then on me and my friends because oh you can’t do that. Why is this Wikipedia. Your saying I have to follow your policy but your administrators don’t? Why? Your treating your newer users in a manner that is not necessary. Your blocking users who trying to add the information, pictures, and logo’s back that are getting deleted every day. Your company and administrators don’t have a deletion policy but yet you have a policy to add information. Why? If your company is going to let people delete things at least have a policy that makes it where they have to now incorporate that information in the history section. Your administrators and company say your policies are their to keep Wikipedia from being vandalized but in reality Wikipedia is still being vandalized every day when information disappears from your Wikipedia page. You blocking me on your administrators behalf is not cool and is wrongful of you. You have the opportunity to look into what I am trying to do but yet your company is trusting your administrators and letting your administrators block people that don’t deserve to be blocked. I quit frankly thinking your company and administrators are taking steps way to far out of your policies and that to me and my friends is wrongful of your administrators and company. You may not like what I have said in this, but you and your administrators are the problem. Not me, not my friends, not your new comers. You and your administrators are the real problem.
Welcome![edit]
Hello, KTVANEWS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was KTVA, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Best practices for editors with close associations
- Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Idahocool30, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:27, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Your username[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created KTVA, and I noticed that your username, "KTVANEWS", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".
Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Your KTVA file[edit]
All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Your company files do not meet this requirement. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Why does the newer KTVA logo keep getting deleted? It is still there logo until September, 3rd 2021. Why does KTVA also not have a founder listed? By what I am reading from this Wikipedia article isn’t Augie Hiebert the founder of KTVA? If you people are going to delete the newer logo then put it in the history section. If you are going to remove KTVA’s logo then I will just keep adding it until you decide to utilize it. So figure out how to utilize the Newer KTVA logo. I don’t care if you fix the wording at the bottom but stop deleting the newer logo for KTVA. The location for KTVA and Denali media holdings is listed on Google maps still which is where I got the location from. Denali media holdings had KTVA in their building but unfortunately When you type KTVA in it shows you there smaller old building that they used until they renovated dozens of office space to prep the location that is listed for their news room.
KTVANEWS (talk) 06:22, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Question[edit]
Why does the newer KTVA logo keep getting deleted? It is still there logo until September, 3rd 2021. Why does KTVA also not have a founder listed? By what I am reading from this Wikipedia article isn’t Augie Hiebert the founder of KTVA? If you people are going to delete the newer logo then put it in the history section. If you are going to remove KTVA’s logo then I will just keep adding it until you decide to utilize it. So figure out how to utilize the Newer KTVA logo. I don’t care if you fix the wording at the bottom but stop deleting the newer logo for KTVA. The location for KTVA and Denali media holdings is listed on Google maps still which is where I got the location from. Denali media holdings had KTVA in their building but unfortunately When you type KTVA in it shows you there smaller old building that they used until they renovated dozens of office space to prep the location that is listed for their news room. KTVANEWS (talk) 06:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
May 2021[edit]
You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.
Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.
You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text
{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.
Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:06, 23 May 2021 (UTC)I should be unblocked because I have been trying to save a logo For KTVA that keeps being deleted off of Wikipedia. Over the years I have watched information, pictures and logos get deleted because some how they are no longer need in the history column. I have been trying to bring information back that has been being deleted every year. I know who founded KTVA but It never sticks because your administrators are then deleting the information that I just added. There has been information from KTVA’s Wikipedia page that has been deleted from information, pictures to now A logo that deserves to honored and shown somewhere on your KTVA’s Wikipedia page. I am not your problem your administrators are the problem and like it or not your company is letting your administrators get away with it. Your letting your administrators delete information, pictures and logo’s from your website that deserve to be recognized and honored. Your administrators are the real problem and they are the ones destroying your website. From the minute I logo on or create a account for a friend so I can edit your website and add back information, pictures, and logo, your company and administrators are then on me and my friends because oh you can’t do that. Why is this Wikipedia. Your saying I have to follow your policy but your administrators don’t? Why? Your treating your newer users in a manner that is not necessary. Your blocking users who trying to add the information, pictures, and logo’s back that are getting deleted every day. Your company and administrators don’t have a deletion policy but yet you have a policy to add information. Why? If your company is going to let people delete things at least have a policy that makes it where they have to now incorporate that information in the history section. Your administrators and company say your policies are their to keep Wikipedia from being vandalized but in reality Wikipedia is still being vandalized every day when information disappears from your Wikipedia page. You blocking me on your administrators behalf is not cool and is wrongful of you. You have the opportunity to look into what I am trying to do but yet your company is trusting your administrators and letting your administrators block people that don’t deserve to be blocked. I quit frankly thinking your company and administrators are taking steps way to far out of your policies and that to me and my friends is wrongful of your administrators and company. You may not like what I have said in this, but you and your administrators are the problem. Not me, not my friends, not your new comers. You and your administrators are the real problem. KTVANEWS (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 19:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)I should be unblocked because I have been trying to save a logo For KTVA that keeps being deleted off of Wikipedia. Over the years I have watched information, pictures and logos get deleted because some how they are no longer need in the history column. I have been trying to bring information back that has been being deleted every year. I know who founded KTVA but It never sticks because your administrators are then deleting the information that I just added. There has been information from KTVA’s Wikipedia page that has been deleted from information, pictures to now A logo that deserves to honored and shown somewhere on your KTVA’s Wikipedia page. I am not your problem your administrators are the problem and like it or not your company is letting your administrators get away with it. Your letting your administrators delete information, pictures and logo’s from your website that deserve to be recognized and honored. Your administrators are the real problem and they are the ones destroying your website. From the minute I logo on or create a account for a friend so I can edit your website and add back information, pictures, and logo, your company and administrators are then on me and my friends because oh you can’t do that. Why is this Wikipedia. Your saying I have to follow your policy but your administrators don’t? Why? Your treating your newer users in a manner that is not necessary. Your blocking users who trying to add the information, pictures, and logo’s back that are getting deleted every day. Your company and administrators don’t have a deletion policy but yet you have a policy to add information. Why? If your company is going to let people delete things at least have a policy that makes it where they have to now incorporate that information in the history section. Your administrators and company say your policies are their to keep Wikipedia from being vandalized but in reality Wikipedia is still being vandalized every day when information disappears from your Wikipedia page. You blocking me on your administrators behalf is not cool and is wrongful of you. You have the opportunity to look into what I am trying to do but yet your company is trusting your administrators and letting your administrators block people that don’t deserve to be blocked. I quit frankly thinking your company and administrators are taking steps way to far out of your policies and that to me and my friends is wrongful of your administrators and company. You may not like what I have said in this, but you and your administrators are the problem. Not me, not my friends, not your new comers. You and your administrators are the real problem. KTVANEWS (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
- KTVANEWS, if you wish to be unblocked you may request an unblock by copying and pasting
{{Unblock-un|user=new username|reason=your reason here ~~~~}}(everything between and including the curly brackets) where "new username" is replaced with a username you would like to use instead of your current username and "your reason here" with relevant information and what you intend to edit if unblocked. I suggest that you take a look at the guide to making unblock requests, that you keep concise and explain why the accounts Idahocool30 and KTVA11 NEWS based on technical evidence seem to be your accounts. Furthermore, conflict of interest is strongly discouraged and making edits for payment without proper disclosure is against the terms of use of Wikipedia. The administrators on this site are volunteers and as such concise unblock requests are generally processed quicker. You need to choose a new username because usernames should not represent a group, organization or website. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:41, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
{{Unblock}reason= I was blocked for sock puppet for another account. I created another account for my friend who asked if I could create one for him one. I was also blocked for adding information including the newer logo back that was previously removed from KTVA’s Wikipedia page. There is no reason why I have to sit my self for a picture that hasn’t been removed from KTVA’s Wikipedia page. If the logo is going to be deleted from the top then put it in the history section below. There is newer logos for tv stations that are being deleted every day because oh that’s not needed anymore. The news logos and store logos deserve to be honored somewhere on the page. }} KTVANEWS (talk) 06:57, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked for sock puppet for another account. I created another account for my friend who asked if I could create one for him one. I was also blocked for adding information including the newer logo back that was previously removed from KTVA’s Wikipedia page. There is no reason why I have to sit my self for a picture that has been removed from KTVA’s Wikipedia page previously. There is no information that I have to sit myself for adding back a picture to a Wikipedia. There also is nothing that states that information that has been deleted has to be sited again. If the logo is going to be deleted from the top then put it in the history section below. There is newer logos for tv stations that are being deleted every day because oh that’s not needed anymore. The news logos and store logos deserve to be honored somewhere on the page.
Decline reason:
The sad thing about this block is that you were probably right in your original edit: it seems to me that some of the older logos you put in the article are copyright-ineligible (only common shapes and words in a common typeface) and thus are not violations of our image-use policy, if that's why they were removed. But ... as with all right things, there's a right way and a wrong way to do them. And you chose the wrong way—more than one, in fact. There's the sock- and meatpuppetry that's the current reason for this block, something we do not lightly forgive, especially when someone with access to the Checkuser tool had to go and use it, and there's also your username, which you have addressed in some of your unblock requests but not this one. And even those that have have not proposed adequate replacements. In fact, if you are as you say the owner of KTVA, then per our conflict of interest policy you really have no business editing that page. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KTVANEWS (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked because I help my friend create an account through the same device. I was blocked because I created an account for my self even before my friend told me his account Idahocool30 had been blocked. KTVAAK and Idahocool30 are not connected in any why. I may be the friend of this person but our accounts are not connected. My friend doesn’t have Wi-Fi so he comes and uses my WI-FI and my devices to access his Wikipedia account. Please unblock me and my friend. KTVAAK (talk) 22:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have the same weird writing style as Idahocool30. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
For some reason, you had three open unblock requests at once. In the future, make only one unblock request, please. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I was blocked because I help my friend create an account through the same device. I was blocked because I created an account for my self even before my friend told me his account Idahocool30 had been blocked. KTVAAK and Idahocool30 are not connected in any why. I may be the friend of this person but our accounts are not connected. My friend doesn’t have Wi-Fi so he comes and uses my WI-FI and my devices to access his Wikipedia account. Please unblock me and my friend. Don’t tell me we have the same writing style when most of the people who join including your administrators have the same and almost identical writing style. In the end your administrators are hurting and deleting important information that is valuable for Wikipedia.
Decline reason:
I agree with the conclusions of the other admins and checkusers. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KTVAAK (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
KTVAAK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This block is in place because I created 3 accounts that were for me. I created Idahocool30 because I seen that some information was missing from pictures to the founder. The first time I got blocked I wasn’t sure how long a blocked would last or if I would ever be able to edit Wikipedia again so just like some of us i reacted to the blocked and I created another account KTVAAK . As I tried to edit KTVA on my second account I created I tried to make it look like I was a different person but once you caught me and brought some things to my attention I realized that I am not perfect at this as well. So I decided to create one more account JuneauAK so I could try again to become like you. I have seen how well you have made the information on Wikipedia and I wanted to be apart of it with you all but just like you with these blocks I have realized that I still have a lot of learning to do. I have learned now that just like you I need to work at becoming better at editing something that is a goal of mine. I have never intended for these blocks to happen and I am so sorry that I have lied to try to get unblocked. I now realize that just like you all I have work to do and I need to work at becoming better at siting my resources. I now I have lost your trust and I am willing to go the extra step to become a better editor but this time I want to ask for help and I need your help and guidance on how to edit as editing is not a passion as mine. I promise that from now on I will do my part in helping make Wikipedia a better place even if that means a few blocks helps. I have learned my lesson and am ready to help in anyway I can even if you miss information. I promise I will work to become a better editor with your help as well. Sometimes I need a little guidance to some of the information as well. Once again I am sorry for the lies I have told.
Decline reason:
Given that TPA has been revoked, I'm declining this. I recommend reading up on the standard offer and coming back in half a year to try again. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:45, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
KTVAAK (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Unblock discussion[edit]
While I believe you were well intentioned, you (perhaps inadvertently) ran afoul of our rule against coordinating efforts off Wiki. You were all busily attempting to add content based on KTVA company archives, without understanding that they would not be regarded as WP:reliable sources in Wikipedia's sense of that term, and without stopping and asking why these edits were questionable. Not sure what the blocking admin will want to see for unblocking. Probably agreeing to not editing about KTVA directly, discussing proposed changes and sourcing on the talk page, and only one editor using one account doing the editing. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:00, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I see Dreamy Jazz's note about conflict of interest and editing as part of a job. If you are only here to add company archives, while I think sharing is commendable, sharing them here might not be for the best. In answer to your many why's above, (again) "all content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking." Again, you will need to discuss content and sourcing if unblocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:07, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
I was blocked for sock puppet for another account. I created another account for my friend who asked if I could create one for him one. I was also blocked for adding information including the newer logo back that was previously removed from KTVA’s Wikipedia page. There is no reason why I have to sit my self for a picture that has been removed from KTVA’s Wikipedia page previously. There is no information that I have to sit myself for adding back a picture to a Wikipedia. There also is nothing that states that information that has been deleted has to be sited again. If the logo is going to be deleted from the top then put it in the history section below. There is newer logos for tv stations that are being deleted every day because oh that’s not needed anymore. The news logos and store logos deserve to be honored somewhere on the page. KTVANEWS (talk) 07:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
globally renamed KTVANEWS to KTVAAK[edit]
globally renamed KTVANEWS to KTVAAK . The AK should be sufficient to distinguish an individual. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
- Noting that the friend has made a legal threat.(User talk:Idahocool30) 331dot (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Complaint[edit]
Guys JuneauAK’s account is not part of Idahocool. You have may think this is part of Idahocool but this person has a point. JuneauAK is not part of this because he has used this public IP Address without knowing people have been blocked recently. JuneauAK’s account isn’t abusing any rules. This person is an independent person with an independent account. Unblock JuneauAK. KTVAAK (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- What is your interest in advocating for that other account if you have nothing to do with it? 331dot (talk) 07:52, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Information coming.[edit]
You obviously need answers and I am willing to give you answers if you agree to unblock Idahocool30, Me KTVAAK, and JuneauAK which is not connected to Idahocool30 nor KTVAAK KTVAAK (talk) 05:40, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is not a negotiation. If you don't wish to address the reason for the block completely and honestly, and if you continue socking, your chances of being unblocked are zero. As it is, the chances are low, but not zero yet. The socking needs to stop. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
- Too many lies. Talk page access revoked. Lying at 5:40, then admitting it all at 6:03? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 13:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)