User talk:Judokitty

.

DYK for Choe Han-gi

On 12 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Choe Han-gi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Choe Han-gi (pictured) published a theory that aimed to replace Newtonian mechanics with one based on qi? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Choe Han-gi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Choe Han-gi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for this, feel free to put your articles up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Thank you! Judokitty (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Mi-Young Park moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mi-Young Park. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justiyaya 14:27, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Judokitty! I've moved the page to draft space so that you can improve it a bit more before it goes into the mainspace. The article has a several issues mainly in sourcing. The article needs to be less reliant on primary sources and focus more on secondary sources. An article needs to have multiple, reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject to be included. If you are confused, post something below and ping me. Good work with the DYK above :D Justiyaya 14:30, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

I've patrolled the article and moved it back to its original location. Some sources I found online seemed to suggest notability. The article needs to be trimmed a bit though. Pages should be based off WP:Secondary sources and not primary sources, I think their self published autobiography is overused in the article. Justiyaya 12:47, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

@Justiyaya: Thank you very much for your meticulous reviewing and hard work. There are actually over a dozen third-party reliable sources, but many of them are older print sources that would take some time to dig up. Judokitty (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for putting in the work to write the article and to put it back into mainspace. Digging the sources up is like half the work writing articles like these though, the references are just as important as the information :D Justiyaya 15:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)

Disclose your other accounts and paid edits

Hello Judokitty. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Judokitty. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Judokitty|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.254.242.80 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)