User talk:Jroberts.757

Welcome!

Hello, Jroberts.757, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Matthew D. Roberts, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Peridon (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but...[edit]

The reference you added is about as much use as a chocolate fireguard. It looks user supplied and tells us precisely nothing more than a list of cases. Please look at WP:RS to see what sort of references are needed and which are considered suitable. Peridon (talk) 22:41, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. Sorry to have been a bit abrasive, but it often gets results faster than just putting a tag on does.... Peridon (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is O.K. However, I would like to adress the fact that OYEZ is most certainly not "user supplied." It is a legitimate, highly accredited Supreme Court database. Jroberts.757 (talk) 03:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Roberts[edit]

The question is not whether he and Charles Manson are the same person or not. It's whether Roberts is actually notable enough to have his own independent article or not; it's perfectly normal and acceptable for a title to redirect to another topic that isn't identical, but is related and contains information about title #1, if that first title doesn't or can't have its own article. Bearcat (talk) 09:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]