User talk:Journalist astronomist

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Journalist astronomist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Ian.thomson (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of site guidelines and policies you may find useful[edit]

"Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use <ref>reference tags like this</ref>, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
Wikipedia does not tolerate copyright violations or plagiarism. Paraphrase sources, do not steal text from them.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
A subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment). -- This means wordpress blogs are not reliable sources.
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence. In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.

Ian.thomson (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolve bickering on the Danse Society talk page[edit]

See Talk:The Danse Society#Resolve bickering here. Ian.thomson (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SineBot, thank you and apologies for being a bit messy with my comments JA

Journalist astronomist (talk) 15:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, Any username ending in "Bot" is an automated robot. You can still be polite to them but be aware it's not a human :-) --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL ahahaha oh dear now I really sounded silly! Thanks Neil :-) Journalist astronomist (talk) 18:21, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eh. Some of us are rather fond of the various bots running around in the background and tend to anthropomorphize them. You'll see the occasional thanks, kudos, and scoldings directed towards bots if you become more involved here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lol and I thought I was crazy! :-) Journalist astronomist (talk) 15:01, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page protocol[edit]

Please don't insert your replies before existing replies. New replies to a post should go after existing replies. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. apologies to you too for still struggling a bit with the instructions. Journalist astronomist (talk) 15:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Journalist astronomist, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Journalist astronomist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]