User talk:JonathanGBall

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]

Hi JonathanGBall! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 03:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, JonathanGBall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! SarahStierch (talk) 00:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Spiritismes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the article to Spiritismes rather than the combined name, as this seems to be the official name. If this is wrong, just move the thing yourself. If you don't know how, see WP:MOVE. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Spiritismes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spiritismes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritismes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 18:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spiritismes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeanne de France (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Guy Maddin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Beard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

My Winnipeg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ann Savage

The Saddest Music in the World (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to David Fox

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why delete the list of resurrected works[edit]

Thank you for your efforts to improve this article, but why did you delete the list of works? Please discuss before deleting again. thank you, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:41, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent interview, the filmmaker, Maddin, discussed changes to the project, and noted that "the films shot for the *Seances* will NEVER exist as stand-alone shorts. They will only be broken up into fragments and placed in the *Seances* program for recombinations and endless permutations for the visitors to the interactive." JonathanGBall (talk) 19:47, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting detail that I agree could be added. However, I don't see why a thorough encyclopedia article on this project should not include the list of films "resurrected," if we have reliable sources. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:54, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. However, please remember that editors do not own articles and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on Seances (film). If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but you appear to have removed several reliable sources in favour of exclusively citing yourself. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be better to return the original material and then supplement it with explanation of the project changes from the more recent interviews? JonathanGBall (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure. I appreciate that you're trying to update and tighten the article. I just became concerned about your removal of some independent reliable sources in favour of only cites to your own blog article. So I didn't touch the rest of your new content. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:58, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. I thought maybe it would be bad to have contradictory info. Maybe I should restore a lot of the older info with the original sources, and frame it to show the development?

If there were inaccuracies that you've corrected, I don't see the need to restore. Was the info "contradictory" because the preexisting info was flat-out wrong, or has there been a "development" of the project over time? We needn't show the "development" of the Wikipedia article over time, if you're correcting inaccuracies. But if you have removed information related to the history of the project, I'd be concerned. Per WP:NOTPAPER, there's no limit to how much detail we can go into, if it's encyclopedically notable. Does that answer your question? thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:08, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, if you wish, I can easily restore to the article to its previous state and we can go from there, working to together. I can help you in terms of correctly formatting your blogpost reference, etc. Please let me know if this is something you'd like. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You know more about the policies than I do, so do that if you think it makes sense. I feel like the thing needs to be rewritten entirely, but maybe it makes sense to restore the earlier version and then run a newer version past you? JonathanGBall (talk) 20:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to undo all your work. I'd be content to leave your new sections as is, along with the now-restored passages on the resurrected film and theatrical and interactive launches -- and just format things a little better. But do you still believe the article needs to be "rewritten entirely," even after all your changes? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:27, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I mean rewritten from the original version, not this one ... do you want to take this over for now, and do the reformatting you've noted? It would be good to also have some info about how those "resurrected films" aren't really going to be released but fragmented into the interactive, etc. Then maybe after I see what you do, I could spend some time tomorrow bringing the section in the main Maddin article in line with this stuff? JonathanGBall (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do some tinkering and clean up now, sure. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks!! I have to go offline and pick up my daughter. Also, re: the resurrected films... since the project shifted it appears that those films were really not "resurrected" at all -- everything was just originally scripted, rather than being based on historical research as previously planned and stated. That's why I wasn't sure about the value of the list. At minimum I feel it needs some sort of framing, maybe you can think of a good way to do it? Thanks a lot JonathanGBall (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look -- I've done some tidying. As you'll see, we have a way to format references so that it only appears once, at the end. And I do agree that, under the circumstances, the proposed "theatrical" seems to be no more than an abandoned intention, so I personally don't think it needs to be addressed (others may disagree later and re-add this). best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I like it! I made a minor edit, because one link was redirecting to a disambiguation page, but otherwise I think this looks much better. When the interactive site launches this year then there will be more work to do, but I think it works for now. Thanks! JonathanGBall (talk) 16:31, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Great. And while I know you're busy with your own work and writing, if you ever want to become involved in some way in Wikipedia:WikiProject Film, I'm sure your contributions would be welcome. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I want to spend some time improving the Winnipeg Film Group-related stuff on the site, definitely. I wrote a book about John Paizs that was recently published by U of Toronto P and his stuff also needs updating. Maddin's stuff is where I've focused since his was brutally poor for the most famous of the Winnipeg filmmakers, plus it was a break from writing about Paizs, and he's the most-written about of the WFG people. I don't know if joining that wiki project would be a good or bad idea in terms of how much time I could devote, but I'll think about it. Thanks! JonathanGBall (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Seances (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeanne de France. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Forbidden Room (2015 film) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Forbidden Room (2015 film). Thanks! j⚛e decker ^talk 08:58, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Forbidden Room (2015 film) (January 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of films and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Forbidden Room (2015 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:58, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, JonathanGBall. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]