User talk:JohnGotten

October 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per WP:NOTHERE--Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnGotten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I want to understand the reason of this block, I made edits that are valid and useful, as in e.g.: List of libraries damaged during World War II; and Serbia,Croatia,Bosnia talk page and edits. I don't know the reason for that block, so much that it was not explained. I think this block is invalid, and I want to be unblocked. Thanks for listening JohnGotten (talk) 03:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to be here to right great wrongs. See WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS, WP:BATTLEGROUND. Yamla (talk) 10:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnGotten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read the terms and see that I did not violate. If I violated, I would have deleted texts from the List of libraries damaged during World War II; and Serbia,Croatia, Bosnia talk page and edits., or even put texts without reference, something I didn't do. The "editing war" was not intended to impede development. If I had done the wrong thing, the basis I laid in my edits would not have been completely erased. or things would be in the previous version before my edit. This sounds like censorship with intentions unlike from the ethics of wikipedia. If I were a supporter of the Holocaust and Nazism, or a revisionist or something, the censorship is valid. But it is not my case, because I put more information about crimes and things related to Nazism, showing how disgusting the Nazis and the hatred are. Anyway, I still think the block is invalid, and I want to be unblocked. Thanks for listening JohnGotten (talk) 06:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That you didn't do more than you did is not a point in your favor. I think you will need some sort of topic ban in order to be unblocked, but that will be up to the next administrator. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnGotten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ok, i don't see any logic in an "eternal ban", since what i did doesn't justify, it could be a one month ban, but forever? this is clearly an illogical censorship. I request at least one valid term banning time. thanks for listening JohnGotten (talk) 18:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your ban is not eternal, it is indefinite. Once you can convince us that you understand why you have been blocked, and that you will not act the same way again, you will be unblocked. However if you simply make frivolous unblock requests your ability to edit this page may be removed. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 21:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

JohnGotten (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So, i have readed the List of guidelines, and i will correct my acts, i will stop disruptive edit and go to talk page when some text needed be edited

Decline reason:

Per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JohnGotten. CU confirmed sockmaster. Sro23 (talk) 23:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.