User talk:Jlascar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Jlascar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Andvd (talk) 09:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Andvd[reply]

Edit warring on Webshots[edit]

Please stop edit warring, even if it's not fast enough to violate WP:3RR, and discuss on the article talk page.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jasper, I am not interfering with the continuous edits of Looper72 enhancing the article and (casually) one of the founders of Webshots, Narendra Rocherolle. Now, if you look at my history of contributions and at his, it will take you 5 seconds to work out that Looper72 has a personal interest in Webshots, and for instance he was forced to change the tone of Mr. Rocherolle's article so it did not sound like an advertisement.
My point is that we are dealing with someone who has a strong personal interest in this article which obviously will defend a position that is not NPV compliant. NPV is about showing both sides of the coin and in this case I think that the article talks about one of the uses that Webshots gave to an its customer's desktop application: malware distribution - Which few years ago affected many users.
The protection you have set has now left the page without any information to the distribution of malware which affected many users and, in my opinion, are a part of the history of Webshots. --Jlascar 05:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
NPOV is also about giving appropriate weight to different viewpoints. Not being an administrator, I wasn't the one who added the page protection.
In addition, it's going to be hard to reach a compromise without introducing reliable sources into the discussion to determine appropriate weight.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Main post office, Kraków has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable post office. Fails WP:N.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SL93 (talk) 10:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Main post office, Kraków[edit]

Hi, I'm DGG. Jlascar, thanks for creating Main post office, Kraków!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. your article Main post office, Kraków needs some references to show its notability. Please add them quickly.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brisbane meetup[edit]

Hi there! We are organising a meetup on Saturday August 22 at 11am at the SLQ Café in South Brisbane, and we'd love for you to come along. A list of people interested in coming, and a discussion space has been created at Wikipedia:Meetup/Brisbane/8. Hope to see you there! Kerry (talk) 08:52, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Jlascar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jlascar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Jlascar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]