User talk:JasonBrown92

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, JasonBrown92. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Blablubbs (talk) 21:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, do you have any connection to OscarSammeli? --Blablubbs (talk) 21:53, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Blablubbs, I do not have any connection to OscarSammeli or Henrik Ekelund. I am very new to wikipedia though and am wondering why my changes were blocked?
From my understanding the information I added is accurate with proper citations. Additionally, I would like to add factbox for Henrik's site and wonder if that would be possible. JasonBrown92 (talk) 06:38, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Because you re-added poorly sourced (including a citation to Wikiwand, a Wikipedia mirror), promotional material that reads much like a PR bio. Your edit was pretty much a word for word repeat of the one made by OscarSammeli; can you explain how that happened? --Blablubbs (talk) 10:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Blablubbs, new duck [1][2]. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:OscarSammeli per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OscarSammeli. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Spicy (talk) 09:55, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]