User talk:Jaberryhill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Jaberryhill! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Footwarrior (talk) 09:37, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Murder of Meredith Kercher‎[edit]

I reverted your edits on the Murder of Meredith Kercher‎ article. The information you provided was correct, but some time ago a decision was made to not give full names of roommates, friends and witnesses for reasons of privacy. I would support using first names only for people like Filomena and Laura, as it might improve the readability of the article. But such a change should be discussed on the article's talk page first. --Footwarrior (talk) 09:45, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

and lots of external links to sites arguing the guilt or innocence of the various parties are not needed. This is not the job of an encyclopaedia. They were accused, found guilty, sentenced. They have appealed. The appeal results will appear in the article.  pablo 22:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for off-wiki co-ordinated votestacking and meatpuppetry (see this link - section "Meatpuppetry and votestacking at MfD"). You may be unblocked if you convincingly account for your editing patterns - i.e. 3 months of inactivity after only editing one topic area, followed by a sudden return (along with multiple other editors) to attempt to stack consensus at a deletion discussion. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:12, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jaberryhill (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like Jim Wales to know that I was unfairly blocked by a corrupt Admin for protesting against their corrupt Administation on another editor. I was one of several who were blocked at the same time. Black Kite needs to be removed as an admin and I request my block as well as anyone else Black Kite banned be unblocked as well Jaberryhill (talk) 04:08, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 07:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.