User talk:Irin161

January 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to America's Next Top Model (cycle 16) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: America's Next Top Model (cycle 16) was changed by Irin161 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950101 on 2014-01-04T17:37:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rupaul's Drag Race Contestant Table Edit[edit]

Hello.

I noticed that you recently made some modifications to the contestant table on the RuPaul's Drag Race (season 6) article. However, those modifications were nonconstructive and unnecessary. Unless you want to make edits for the benefit of the page, don't do them. Otherwise, you simply waste your time, and our time undoing your edits.

Thank you for your understanding.

─ Fabzzz _talk 15:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to say that my modifications to the Rupaul's Drag Race Season 6 page were not unnecessary. When viewing the page on any type of phone or tablet, the boxes of each individual contestant were not in line and were all different shapes and sizes. Unless you have any other alternative to combat this problem, I will continue to edit for the benefit of mobile or tablet users who want to keep updated with the latest Rupaul's Drag Race news in the CORRECT format.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Irin161 (talk • contribs)

I'm looking at the article on a mobile device right now, and it looks perfectly fine. The size, boxes, shapes and sizes all look perfectly fine. The format and color of the contestant table has been decided here. If you want to discuss or propose any modifications, please do it there. If not, any changes to the format of the contestant table will be reverted. Wikipedia is not initially designed for mobile devices. If the mobile device you are using cannot load the contestant table properly, that is neither fair or a good excuse to make a changes for the whole community only for the mobile device you use to make it compatible. Again, your edits will simply result in a waste of your time, since your edits will be reverted.

Again, thank you for understanding. ─ Fabzzz _talk 05:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Noyster. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to James Jordan (dancer) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! : Noyster (talk), 14:57, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Tymon.r. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Big Brother 16 (UK)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 09:34, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Colour in The X Factor (UK series 13)[edit]

Please do not change the colour but discuss first to reach a consensus at Talk:The X Factor (UK series 13)#Lifeline vote. Thanks. anemone projectors 12:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 13), you may be blocked from editing. Class455 (talk) 21:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 13). anemone projectors 19:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style violation[edit]

Please refrain from making edits like this one and also this one. The use of silver and bronze to highlight 2nd and 3rd places is not done on Eurovision articles. That decision was unanimously agreed by consensus of the members of Project Eurovision, as Eurovision only awards to the winner (which is highlighted in gold). Wes Wolf ^Talk 16:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Eurovision Song Contest 2015. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. If you continue, you will be blocked for edit warring and 3-revert rule. Wes Wolf ^Talk 16:46, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2014, you may be blocked from editing. Yo have been warned about this, and now your actions are deemed as vandalism. Wes Wolf ^Talk 16:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2013. Wes Wolf ^Talk 16:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Eurovision Song Contest 2012, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wes Wolf ^Talk 16:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 17:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Irin161. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race UK (series 2)[edit]

Mind your manners, please. It is because of disruptive editors that the article is locked--given your history, you should know that. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:03, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 22:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Irin161! While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Talk:RuPaul's_Drag_Race_UK_(series_2).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]