User talk:Incognipedia

Hello, Incognipedia, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs more/better sources than what is currently in the article.

Goodreads is not usable as a source on Wikipedia, as it's relatively easy for someone to gain permission to add or edit book information. It's also easy for people to sway ratings in one direction or another and it used to be extremely common for authors or publishers to try and do just this. Goodreads particularly has a history of this, especially when it came to bombing a book with negative reviews and ratings. I recommend looking up information on this as it's honestly both fascinating and horrifying at times how people reacted. This response from the SFWA touches on it lightly. In any case, reviews and ratings from social media type sites like Goodreads that accept user reviews aren't considered to really be relevant on Wikipedia unless there's a large amount of coverage for the ratings, as was the case with the film Saving Christmas and the book Bend, Not Break.

Primary sources like the book itself are usable, however they cannot establish notability.

The tweet is unlikely to be seen as in-depth enough to count towards notability. Yes, it's Imran Khan, a major public and political figure, but it's still extremely short. If there were to be a longer review published elsewhere, like a newspaper or an official website it would be different. It's just that this would likely be seen as a WP:TRIVIAL source by many, which can be frustrating.

Given the praise from Khan and the publisher, there's likely some coverage from academic and scholarly publications - I'd recommend hitting up JSTOR or other academic/scholarly databases and seeing what you can find there. Also, coverage doesn't have to be in English so if there is some coverage in other languages (even though this book is in English), that can be used as well.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Incognipedia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:42, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notes[edit]

I've gone through and cleaned the draft and added some sourcing. I'm left kind of unsure of notability and more than a little irritated. It's one of those situations where I'd personally consider it to be notable. The first review is good and the tweet by the PM did get coverage, so that could potentially be considered enough. However because of the brevity of the tweet and the general lack of coverage as a whole, it's light enough to where I'm concerned that it could be challenged if I were to approve it. I think that it would be good to bring in a second person to review it. I'm going to tag someone whose opinion I trust when it comes to borderline cases. (@DGG:) DGG, I'm really torn on this one per what I wrote above. If you think that this could survive being live, then I have no problem with this being moved. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:12, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, left him a note on his talk page as well. If DGG doesn't think that this is viable then unfortunately there's not much else that can be done. I added all of the sourcing I could discover and unless there's more in another language, the only thing that can be done is to wait and see if more sourcing becomes available over time or if the author were to be notable. The more time that passes after a book's release, the less likely that coverage will become available, however it's possible that the May 2020 tweet may end up resulting in some additional interest - although of course, the further time gets from that point, the less likely that will be.

Now what I will say is that if he's the same person who created the Barack Obama "Joker" poster, then it may be worth looking into whether there's more coverage out there for him as an individual. There may be enough to argue for him to be notable per WP:NBIO. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:25, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Incognipedia (talk • contribs) 04:31, January 12, 2021 (UTC)

No problem! One note though - when you respond on a talk page, make sure that you sign using four tildes (~~~~) You can also sign using the toolbar above the editing area - the button for signing will look like an x followed by a scribble/signature and will come right after the bold and icon buttons. It just lets us know that it's you when you post. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go :) Incognipedia (talk) 11:06, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past has been accepted[edit]

Lost Islamic History: Reclaiming Muslim Civilisation from the Past, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 18:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fredrik Alexandersson (August 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fredrik Alexandersson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fredrik Alexandersson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:59, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fredrik Alexandersson[edit]

Hello, Incognipedia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fredrik Alexandersson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]