This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you are understanding what I said earlier. I used my IP address to edit instead of this account to not cause any commotion. This is the account I usually use to edit, mainly subjects related to the music industry/music in general as well as obscure international cuisines and LGBTQIA+ issues. Had I not been blocked I would be using this account to edit.
I understand, I should not have used my IP address as a way to bypass having my edits shown under my username. My apologies for that, and I accept my block. However, that does not negate the fact that you have completely, once again, ignored my main point. Frank Farian was not born in West Germany. Drmies refused to provide a reason for reverting my edits, merely calling the changes "activism" and saying that "it wasn't going to work". All I want is reasoning as to how these reverts don't violate Wikipedia's MOS:CONTEXTBIO as well as the rest of MOS:BIO (see MOS:BIRTHPLACE where it is stated that biographical infoboxes should contain a birthplace's at the time of its subject's birth). But here's the largest point I was trying to make: I was raised on a city block with around a 50% Jewish population, and, like it or not, many Jews do not want "Germany" (an innocent country with a history of great freeways and architecture... oh and electronic music) to be associated with the n***s at all, and for a very strong obvious reason. So labelling the "German Reich" (aka N**i Germany) as simply "Germany" honestly just seems insensitive and like it could cause offense to potentially many people, to be honest. If you do not provide a reason as to why my edits kept being reverted (and "it's not going to work" isn't a reason) I will be respectfully taking this to Wikipedia's Arbitration committee.
I am not mad at anyone and do not intend to cause trouble. I just want to make sure my edits were being properly reverted for a solid and accurate cause, as well as, like I said earlier, to ensure that nobody is offended are they to read the article.
