User talk:Immeraviya

Request to move article Bergesen Worldwide incomplete

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Bergesen Worldwide to a different title - however your proposal is either incomplete or has been contested as being controversial. As a result, it has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete after five days will be removed.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
2. Added {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved, to automatically create a discussion section there.
3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR (talk) 08:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello Immeraviya. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to BW Group, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Immeraviya. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Immeraviya|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Longhair\^talk 07:54, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

I don’t know what edits you’re referring to as I haven’t logged into Wikipedia until today, but regardless, I’m not being paid for any edits. Immeraviya (talk) 08:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Astri Okstad, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Longhair\^talk 09:23, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Astri Okstad is not me so that account should not be linked to me. Immeraviya (talk) 12:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Denying it will be insufficient, as every sockpuppeteer denies doing so, since that is the whole point. If you are not socking, please address why we might think you are if you are not; you may do this on the SPI. 331dot (talk) 12:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

I have no idea what this is referring to. Can you share the link? Or delete whatever is bothering you. Immeraviya (talk) 12:19, 30 July 2021 (UTC)