User talk:Iiii I I I

regarding your marking edits as vandalism on List of Law & Order: UK episodes

Regarding your edit earlier today to List of Law & Order: UK episodes, there has been some issue with summaries being copied from elsewhere. It is somewhat complicated by only parts of each summary being direct copy & paste into the article. The edits that you marked as vandalism [1] removed a summary which contains some phrasing that is an exact match to the summary from cast member Bradley Walsh's site [2]. I only went looking into it when the user who removed it disputed your calling the removal vandalism. Unlike with most episode lists Law & Order | UK is not so easy to pick out wikipedia:copyright violations due to the length of the summaries, the character limit in googling a phrase, and the many international broadcasters which sometimes each have their own summary on their respective websites, in addition to the typical IMDb, tv.com, et al.
In general it is good practice to look into a claim of copyright violation before simply reverting an edit and potentially restoring a copyright violation. If you restore a copyright violation you then are held accountable for it being in the article. Persistent insertion of copyright violations can get you blocked. Be careful. delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 17:25, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

follow-up to response on my talk page: I saw you are an admin on a wikia site so i assumed you know the technical side of wikis but maybe didn't know the policies here. If you want to read it you can see my welcome message at user:deliriousandlost/welcome. Normally it would be like the header on a talk page but you already have one. :P It has links to basic policies and cookies and more ~hugs~ delirious & lost ☯ ^~hugs~ 18:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Please stop

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to WP:BLPN, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. 184.59.23.225 (talk) 02:22, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for this. A Macedonian (talk) 15:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Re: hai

hai thar, why do you not use the same name on Wikipedia as you use on Wikia? ZamorakO o (talk) 17:20, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Aww mans. :c ZamorakO o (talk) 17:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Bully (video game)

Please stop reverting me. In addition to denying consensus, you are identifying my good faith edits as vandalism, which is misuse of Twinkle and has been known to cause Wikipedia to disallow users the privilege to use it. 108.15.29.31 (talk) 20:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry if that came across harsh, I wasn't trying to be a jerk, but I have seen it happen. Wikipedia revokes rollback and script access at the drop of a hat. I used to edit with a username and it happened to me (among many others). 108.15.29.31 (talk) 20:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

On your marking of edits as vandalism on Valencian

Please, read policies on Vandalism before tagging as such any modification, and not giving a proprer explanation. Note that edits on the article Valencian were made in good faith, as the massive deletion of information was due to moving such information to a new specific article Valencian language controversy, while an small abstract and reference was left in the article. Also note that, as a result of your revertion, information has been lost, ongoing work on restructure of the article has gone down the drain, and text now makes no sense. If desired, please answer in Valencian talkpage. User: IeXrivâ 20:16, 29 November 2010

Thanks for your quick answer. Can't undo your modification, as there is a new one after yours. I'll see how to fix it. Anyway, I consider that correcting vandalism is relevant task and thank you for your labor in this sense. Regards. User: IeXrivâ 23:32, 29 November 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by IeXrivâ (talk • contribs)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Artok

Hello AznBurger. I am just letting you know that I deleted Artok, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:13, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Twinkle not recognising user talk page redirects

I've undone [3] this edit of yours. The message should have been placed on the target of the redirect instead. I've asked at the Village Pump (technical) if Twinkle can be fixed to stop this happening again. Best wishes, DuncanHill (talk) 14:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

hai

do i no u? Ajraddatz (Talk) 16:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

im teh person who eats teh burgrs Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:46, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

american@@@ im nawt ameirencan Ajraddatz (Talk) 03:47, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

im teh cannandaian aznburgr eatr Ajraddatz (Talk) 18:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

*nom nom nom* Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:42, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

i c u

Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:05, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Ask for it. Just say that you're a sysop on rswiki, and know how to use it. Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

thar Ajraddatz (Talk) 01:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

AMG

I see a nub, oh wait this isn't Ajr's page. Sentra246 (talk) 02:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

nou Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:51, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Ya, I know, he's as much of a sockpuppet as ajr is cool. Sentra246 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC).

nou nou nou nou nou im pro Ajraddatz (Talk) 02:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

wat

hai thar wat do i do here Chess1242 (talk) 16:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Ra: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Ben Ben (talk) 19:31, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your answer on my talk page. I prefer holding a talk on the page where it was started. Have seen on your user page you are using Twinkle. Twinkle has most of the uw-templates build in, just click on the "warn"-title when you are on a user talk page.--Ben Ben (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

lol way to bite the nub Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:45, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

be quiet, ajr >:( --AznBurger (talk) 19:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

yes maam Ajraddatz (Talk) 19:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Most Important

Why are you stalking me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.227.110.46 (talk) 03:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Re:Re:Most Important

It's k. :3 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.227.110.46 (talk) 04:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii i found yu!

HAI IIII_I_I_I HAO R YU @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ Sactage Talk 14:21, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Warning users

Hi, I've noticed that you have a fair amount of good reverts to your name but very few (if any) warnings issued to vandals. I just wondered why you don't follow through with a warning? ^Alex J _Fox (Talk) (Contribs) 14:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Iiii I I I. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

I noticed that a message you recently left to 2600:387:B:7:0:0:0:C3 may have been unduly harsh for a newcomer. Please remember not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Remember to assume good faith. They did not vandalise, they were simply (but misguidedly) trying to apply NPOV. Thanks. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Iiii I I I. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:Tennis Integrity Unit logo.svg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Iiii I I I. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Timeless Newsletter • Issue 4

Newsletter • April 2019

Welcome to the fourth issue of the Timeless newsletter, with a cat! Or maybe not.

Un chat qui miaule???

It's true! The angry cat, a fundamental part of Timeless, has resulted in confusion and bug reports all across the projects and phabricator. And now it shall be immortalised forever in the new, shiny Timeless logo.

Updates:

After putting off the project for three months because I got hit in the head with a flight of stairs, and then putting off the project for another two months while working out what the status of the grant was, I have now put off the project even more in order to focus on my other project for a bit. So progress lately has been a bit whims-based as a result:

• The project now has a logo. For some reason.
• The angry cat in the background is now customisable! Behold: not a cat. What would you like to replace it with on your project?
• I broke, unbroke, and then sort of sideways broke all the form styles. Help.

Radar:

• The French Wiktionary voted to set Timeless as their default skin, with results possibly as you might expect: I ran away and hid, and the WMF said no. A bit of discussion later and we largely agreed that all else aside, this is a bit of a branding issue, but we love the enthusiasm! Also the bug reports that inevitably come out of such a discussion. I'm still working on properly going through those.
• Theme support is still stuck in limbo, but now we have another skinning RfC. tl;dr, we wanna replace the entire skinning system, and Skizzerz'll write a prototype later.

I will be fully resuming work on Timeless next week, or maybe the week after, depending on what madness (or illness) comes out of the Hackathon in Prague. Please come talk to me there to discuss strategy!

-— Isarra ༆ 16:51, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Timeless Newsletter • Issue 5

Newsletter • August 2019

Welcome to the fifth and final issue of the Timeless newsletter!

Progress was made. True story.

I am happy to announce that after about a year, this delightful project in which absolutely nothing has gone according to plan is coming to a close. Or at least, the grant-funded portion is. Which means we will now be resuming our regular schedule of random whims-based development, you probably won't notice any difference whatsoever unless you use MonoBook, and there's a report.

What's new from the past two months:

A lot less than we'd hoped, frankly. We:

• Fixed various bugs, some of which even weren't for stuff I'd just broken two patches previously.
• Resolved sundry compatibility issues for other extensions, templates onwiki, whatever, largely by removing dumb crap from the css.
• Implemented some shiny new features you'll probably hate or just never use or actually see, like click-toggled dropdowns, icons everywhere, and options to select a default layout or set an image for the site header wordmark.
• Brought the total number of open tasks on the Timeless workboard down to 70.

We also wound up with:

• Patches resulting in RelatedArticles working in MonoBook, and FlaggedRevisions showing up in Minerva, unless someone actually managed to turn that off as well. (Blame T181242.) It's possible we went a little overboard with the whole 'let's close all the tasks!' sprint.
• An unfortunate repeated discovery that themes (the Night/Winter variants I keep insisting will happen at some point) are still pretty far off on the horizon. Um.
• Possibly a quite a few more bugs coming your way. This month, and especially the past week, have been a bit of a mess, development-wise. While hopefully none of the worse issues make it to production, please keep the reports coming for whatever you do find and we'll get it fixed as soon as we can. Y'all've been amazing about this, and it's really appreciated.

And I guess that's that. I'm really bad at reporting, and this is a report. For the purposes of the grant, this was a requirement, but do you want me to keep trying to send these out?

-— Isarra ༆ 18:08, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delfin (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolfin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Shang-Chi

Hi, I appreciate you readding the info with a source, and you clearly did this via the "undo" option. That is fine, but please leave a summary such as "readd with source" in future, as having the edit summary as a simple "undid revision by IronManCap" clearly brought about some confusion and an impression that you were edit warring and reinstating unsourced info, which you were clearly not. Thanks. IronManCap (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Pennsylvania State Police fallen officers list removal

I've helped to maintain the fallen officers list on the Pennsylvania State Police page for the last several years. Just recently however, this list was completely removed with the justification of "I'm not aware of any other police department article that lists the names of all its dead for the past hundred years".

However, the following 18 other US state police agency Wikipedia pages have similar lists of their fallen officers: Tennessee Highway Patrol, Louisiana State Police, Maine State Police, South Carolina Highway Patrol, Texas Highway Patrol, New Mexico State Police, Montana Highway Patrol, Wyoming Highway Patrol, South Dakota Highway Patrol, North Dakota Highway Patrol, Connecticut State Police, Rhode Island State Police, Minnesota State Patrol, Indiana State Police, Illinois State Police, Missouri State Highway Patrol, Utah Highway Patrol, and Kansas Highway Patrol... and I only checked the statewide police agencies.

These are long-standing lists that have been on Wikipedia for years. Many of those lists go back nearly 100 years (several to the 1930's), though the only reason most don’t exceed 100 years is simply because those other agencies haven’t existed for that long yet. However the Pennsylvania State Police has. To leave all those other lists intact and arbitrarily remove ONLY the Pennsylvania State Police's memorial list is both inconsistent and nonsensical. Pikeman327 (talk) 17:24, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Accessibility issues for Florida Nav Boxes

Hi @Iiii I I I. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I truly do appreciate you reaching out, without also editing the edits I made (it's a quite time consuming process, I'm sure you're aware). I was going based off of this: https://www.whocanuse.com/?bg=ff9100&fg=333333&fs=16&fw=.

These are one of the resources that was listed on here Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility. The color scheme I have for both the background #FF9100 and the Text 333333, is accessible for most vision sets, with the exception for Cataracs, Low Vision, and Direct Sunlight. Let me know what you think would be a better hue for the background (preferably within Orange, due to the State's intrinsic connection with the [[Shades of orange|color]] and aptly named [[Orange (fruit)|fruit]]).

I was toggling around on the resource you provided: https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/?fcolor=3366CC&bcolor=FF9100; I noticed that the #FFB429 passes Large Texts and Graphical Objects and User Interface Components. Let me know what you think. Freeholdman12 (talk) 02:36, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Crebilly Farm

Hello, Iiii I I I. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crebilly Farm, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:06, 4 May 2024 (UTC)