User talk:Ho Lee Cow

Welcome!

Hello, Ho Lee Cow, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 18:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of the ArbCom remedy[edit]

You are violating section 7 of the Arbitration Committee remedy in the Derek Smart arbitration case. Derek Smart, or those editing as surrogates for him, (meaning in the same style as him) are banned from editing the article page. I'm hereby informing you of this ban, and any further attempts by you to edit the article page will result in your account being blocked from editing. Please note that your account is also under suspicion as being a sockpuppet of User:Supreme Cmdr, a banned account. If it is determined likely that you are in fact a sockpuppet of User:Supreme Cmdr, you will be banned from editing Wikipedia under remedy 3.1 of the Arbitration Case. Furthermore, your edits to that page have been highly unconstructive, reverting sourced information that is critical to Smart and his games. If you continue to do so, you will simply be blocked from editing Wikipedia further. Blanking of this warning constitutes notice that you have read and understood its terms.⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 17:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For continuing to remove sourced material, you have been blocked for 1 week.⇒SWATJester ^{Son of the Defender} 17:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're just great entertainment[edit]

It's so funny that one (as some observer of this page who is even less significant to world history than this - wossisname? Ah yes, Derek Smart) can tell even from the "history" section alone (i. e. only with the comments) that you are "probably", once more Derek Smart himself. While I will refrain from making or accepting any logical connection between the subject of the article and, say "narcism" or any related disorder that might be found among the illnesses narcism can spawn, thereby refraining from violating at least some of the Wiki-Guidlines you disrespect, I nevertheless insist on mentioning that anyone can tell without any further clues that YOU are writing in person. You're style is too much limited and thus characteristic, exhibits too many of YOUR personal typing habits, of YOUR style of (totally unreasonable) personal attacks to prevent us from knowing your identity. Please don't blame your supporters, because both of them are on holiday right now. Please don't blame your admirers and the people who are envious, starving for being just like you, because, I already told that, they both are on holiday right now (I'm not sure if one of them is currently in therapy). Nope, we all know. Just stick to the fact that you are not remarkable except for your ego and the ability to deny the truth, and that your whole life has been - just like that :o) Under regular circumstances, I would never post a statment like this on a personal, or a discussion page, let alone an article. But your willingess to ignore everything that is "Wiki" makes this statement indispensable, I believe. You need to be confronted with the plain truth: You are not fooling anyone. You're much better at making a fool out of yourself. But then again - this might bring you universal fame. - The most ridiculous representant of the species homo sapiens sapiens that ever lived. Willing to pay the price? It is up to you to try and bring damage to the Wikipedia - and then to witness how dear, how considerable, your defeats were, how little you could accomplish when trying to damage the principle of it, even with your remarkable sense of denial and selfishness. You might, on a very remote day, give in to the fact that all you can or could do here (and already have done) is: Ridicule yourself. Nevertheless, I would like to emphasize that your unwillingness to accept the overall concensus has greatly entertained me and great numbers of others, like a clown losing his pants. Sorry, but this is just the level where you stand right now. I will stay tuned for some other reveleations of how low Derek Smart might sink to entertain the public and therefore be noticed, grab some little bit of "fame" :o) I pity you. 88.76.218.226 (talk) 21:36, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]