User talk:Hisham 5ZX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Warning on Fallujah[edit]

You need to discuss these contested changes on the talk page of that article, and work with other editors to resolve problems; you need to not revert repeatedly without discussion; you need to not do blanket reverts that reverse several unrelated changes. Your edits need to have a neutral point of view and your edits need to cite reliable published sources; read Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. —Centrxtalk • 04:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Dulaim. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please don't remove tags, revert other users, insert unverified POV claims. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 09:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned..[edit]

..and you will be blocked if you continue your disruptive editing. Stop reverting other editors. Present your reasons for reverting on the talk page. Here are some of the issues with the article in its current form:

  1. The lack of sources.
  2. Fanciful numbers and statistics, to the point where calling them utterly inaccurate is a major underestimate.
  3. Copyediting is required. The English used is extremely poor.
  4. Fact tags SHOULD NOT be removed!
  5. Take some examples of sentences which demonstrate the problems above:
"The Dulaimis in iraq have Bedouin traditions and Speaking Iraqi Bedouin accent and look like arabs and It's noticeable that the majority of the members of Al-Dulaim tribe are pretty tall."
"Members of the Dulaim cannot hold their heads up high until they avenge the deaths of their cousins by killing Americans."
"The Dulaimis traditions says "if any tribe or group kill Dulaimi in return Dulaimis should kill 4 from them for revenging""

Present reasons for any edit you make! And most importantly discuss it first on the talk page!

Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 10:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Dulaim. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 10:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have broken the 3-revert rule. Λua∫Wise (Operibus anteire) 18:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. ScarianCall me Pat! 14:42, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

For checkuser confirmed sockpuppetry; you have been blocked for two weeks, GDonato (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have extended this block to indefinite because you have continued to abuse multiple accounts by inserting unsourced POV material into Wikipedia articles. EyeSerenetalk 16:38, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]