User talk:Hickskevin2212

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hickskevin2212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have the right to upload any images that I want on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You most certainly do not. Yamla (talk) 01:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to blank declined unblock requests for currently active blocks. Please do not do so again. --Yamla (talk) 21:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for blanking a declined unblock request for a currently active block and promise not to do so again. --Hickskevin2212 (talk) 17:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You broke your word. I have now revoked your access to this talk page, for your continued and deliberate violations. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if you wish to make a case for being unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 12:42, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Your addition to Dawn of Man has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Whpq (talk) 16:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Dawn of Man. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dawn of Man, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you move a page maliciously again, as you did at Will.i.am, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jalen D. Folf (talk) 22:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:42, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hickskevin2212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Orphaned non-free image File:Dawn of Man logo.png

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:17, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Please see WP:COMMONNAME. Also, for a high profile article, there should be a move discussion on the talk page.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 05:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dawn of Man logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dawn of Man logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, West Coast Racers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited South Carolina Confederate Relic Room & Military Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War Memorial Building (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to make disruptive edits despite being blocked twice previously. Your last block was for disruptive page moves, and yet you took it upon yourself to move another editor's user page (!) after they, correctly, reverted your poor edit at Mariah Carey wherein you removed the hidden note specifically advising you not to make the edit you did. I'm not entirely sure you have the competence and collaborative nature required to edit here. I've blocked you indefinitely as previous finite blocks have not stopped the disruption and I need to see assurances from you that you understand how your edits have been disruptive. I would also like to see any unblock conditions include a ban on page moves for the foreseeable future.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hickskevin2212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand how my edits have been disruptive and agree to the unblock conditions which include a ban on page moves for the foreseeable future.

Decline reason:

Not remotely convincing. You need to explain why those edits were disruptive. What specifically were you doing wrong? Yamla (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hickskevin2212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand that I am blocked for moving another editor's user page after correctly reverting my poor edit at Mariah Carey and removing the hidden note which specifically advised not to make the edit I did and I will make productive contributions instead

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Frankly, your acting out is very concerning. I see nothing that convinces me that it won't be something else next week or next month. You'll need to explain what you will do the next time you get pissed off that does not involve someone else getting pissed on. If you take my meaning. Please review the WP:dispute resolution processes and describe what one should do that does not involve childish mischief. Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2019[edit]

Your addition to Gulf Coaster has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Copied from https://www.greatamericaparks.com/great-america-rides/gulf-coaster/ Whpq (talk) 15:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Eiselt (August 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi there. Local politicians don't automatically get Wikipedia articles. So far, the sources shared don't support Ms. Eiselt's notability – we need press coverage! I hope you'll consider working on other articles related to Charlotte or politics. Cheers!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julie Eiselt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Julie Eiselt, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 05:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hickskevin2212! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 05:43, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julie Eiselt[edit]

Hello, Hickskevin2212,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Julie Eiselt, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:18, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joel Dawson concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joel Dawson, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:12, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie Eiselt has been accepted[edit]

Julie Eiselt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:12, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]