User talk:Heavy Horse

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Heavy Horse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for List of etchings by Rembrandt. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 15:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

List of etchings by Rembrandt - quick note but great appreciation

Hey Heavy Horse - damn fine unstinting and most effective work - it's what this project really needs! --Shirt58 (talk) 15:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

FECI QUOD POTUI, FACIANT MELIORA POTENTES Heavy Horse (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Cacatne ursus in sylvis? :-) --Shirt58 (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Botticelli louvre 5.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Botticelli louvre 5.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Your wonderful list List of engravings by Dürer

would imho need one more field for the musea. Regards Oursana (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

I do not think that it is necessary to introduce a new field for museums, because many museums have a collection of engravings by Dürer, for example,

The British Museum Metropolitan Museum of Art Art Institute, Chicago Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam Fogg Art Museum Hermitage Staatliche Museen, Berlin Kupferstichkabinett, Dresden Germanisches Nationalmuseum, Nuremberg Staatliche Kunsthalle, Karlsruhe and so on. Sincerely Yours, Heavy Horse (talk) 11:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

June 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to 2048 (video game), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your attention to my humble contribution to Wikipedia.

1.You are certainly right, all statements shall contain a reference to the source. However, I draw your attention to the fact that in this case we are not talking about a value judgment, opinion or historical fact, but of easy mathematical problem. Under the terms of the game, the number of points for the colliding of two identical tiles doubles. 2+2 = 4. Therefore, for «4» tile two pairs give 4 points, for «8» - 16, and so on, for «2^n» - (n-1)2^n points. Thus, the maximum is 16 +48 +128+ ...+ 2097152 = 3932160 points if the game uses only «2» tiles. But every «4» tile decreases this number. So actually number of points is less, such as in the photo you destroyed (3869064). Let’s write correctly: Maximum points in the game not exceeds 3932160. What we refer? The fact that 2+2 = 4? The multiplication table? 2+2 = 4. Chesterton wrote about this, Dostoevsky, Proust, Orwell... 2. Maybe you do not like the photo or "image breaks section headers". You can re-size it or move. But why destroy? I really hope that you do to fix it. Sincerely Yours. Heavy Horse (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Sure, WP:CALC allows Wikipedia editors to make "routine calculations" without needing a source, but this analysis seems too complex to be considered "routine" - checking the web, other people seem to have arrived at different answers, so it's not that clear cut. Attaching a source would allow the reader to check the context behind that score, rather than having to trust Wikipedia's unsourced voice of authority - it would also discourage others from "correcting" the article to a different score if their calculation came out differently. --McGeddon (talk) 10:59, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Rembrandt Paintings project

Thank you so much for updating this page with the latest attributions, great work!!! Vlad b (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

New page - "Paintings formerly attributed to Rembrandt" - worth creating?

Hi Heavy Horse, I'm thinking about creating a page "Paintings formerly attributed to Rembrandt", which would include an incomplete list of paintings that are not currently (as of volume 6, 2014) recognized as Rembrandt by the Research project, but considered Rembrandt in the past, or still listed as Rembrandt in its museum. This list could include paintings such as "Man in Golden Helmet" in Berlin and "Old Man in Red" in the Hermitage: .

What do you think? Is such a list a good idea?

Vlad b (talk) 17:39, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

May be. But this list will consist of approximately 500 paintings! Heavy Horse (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

That's true, I thought about that. That's why it doesn't need to be a complete list, but it can grow over time and include the more famous paintings with some notes. Vlad b (talk) 19:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

IPBE

Hi,

Just noting that I have removed your IPBE as you are no longer affected by a block. Best, Mike V • Talk 18:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Heavy Horse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Heavy Horse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Heavy Horse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)