User talk:Grabado

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Grabado, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 06:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your list[edit]

@Grabado: Do you intend to help out with the list on User:Grabado/List? Chicbyaccident (talk) 19:34, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicbyaccident: Yes! I've been busy these days and I'm not going be able to continue at least in a week, but removing all the categories that are already redirected [1] is the first thing I'm going to do. If you want to help, go ahead! --Grabado (talk) 08:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No stress. Not sure how to go about myself. Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:42, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicbyaccident: Finally I managed to get some time to start the nomination ;) --Grabado (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! There are still some in the list, though. Chicbyaccident (talk) 08:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicbyaccident: Here you have. I was waiting for the previous discussion to be closed. --Grabado (talk) 07:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm not sure I saw all these ones on the list before. Anyway, wouldn't it be possible to include all the rest of the contents of the list already, at least in a couple of categorised proposals? Chicbyaccident (talk) 09:22, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Chicbyaccident: It could be possible, but I agreed that a case-by-case was a better approach and I plan to follow that procedure. --Grabado (talk) 06:25, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Hi Grabado. I noticed that although you have almost no experience on Wkipedia, you have listed around 200 Catholic school categories for deletion in the last three days or so. Even if the CfD calls are legitimate (I have not checked) we do not have enough editors to process mass listings like this. Please stop. Thanks. (FYI: John from Idegon, TonyBallioni). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง. I have not listed any category for deletion. I have listed categories for renaming, in one single nomination following a previous nomination. As far as I know, I've followed the steps described in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion#Manual nominations. --Grabado (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grabado is right. The proposal followed all formal regulations, and also succeeded, as you can see. Does Grabado intend to make any further proposals? Chicbyaccident (talk) 16:07, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]