User talk:Ggmbenefice

Hello, Ggmbenefice. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article St Nicholas' Church, Gayton, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 13:12, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Ashwicken— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:08, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Harpley, Norfolk with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Congham[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the Congham article, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. You may find our linking guidelines helpful in this regard. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Coretheapple (talk) 15:12, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Little Massingham with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 15:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Great Massingham. Serols (talk) 15:17, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. slakr^\ talk / 21:16, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your username[edit]

Your username violates Wikipedia's username policy because it's the name of a website and, by extension, an organization, and it implies shared use. That's not acceptable. Wikipedia accounts are for individuals, not for groups or organizations, and the username must reflect that. Please request a username change via Special:GlobalRenameRequest or your account may be blocked again. If you want your username to be associated with that organization, a username such as "John at Ggmbenefice" would be acceptable. Thanks in advance, and I apologize for the inconvenience. Huon (talk) 20:11, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]