User talk:GenKnowitall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi[edit]

Hi there. You placed Center of gravity (physics) in the article space. You also noted that it was a draft article.

I have moved it to your userspace, namely, here. When you complete the article, you can move it back to the article space. Thank you. --43?9enter 19:44, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

hi User:43?9enter[edit]

Thank you for your welcome and clear comment. I see from your pages you are a student. Respects and best wishes. I am new to Wikipedia but I understood your action as addressing procedure rather than merits of my change. I note that the previous redirect of 'center of gravity' to 'center of mass' was improper because these are formally distinct concepts in physics. That is what I was attempting to repair. It (belatedly) appears my first attempt to fix this was not correctly done as I did not find and remove the redirect. That seems to be the basis of your objection, or was it something else? GenKnowitall (talk) 00:57, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The reason for my action was that you placed your draft in the article space (used interchangeably with mainspace). If you go to Special:NewPages, you will notice that at least 30% of the new articles are completely unencyclopedic. Your incomplete article would likely have been seen by New Page Patrollers and tagged under Criterion A10 for Speedy Deletion. Articles should be developed in userspace, by creating a subpage, and clicking the "move" tab when you are ready to place it in the mainspace, assuming you use the monobook skin. If you're using vector, then at the top of the article, there should be a star, and next to it an arrow. Mousing over the arrow gives the option to move the page. In short, my objection was based on placing a draft in the mainspace. I saw that page, moved it, and therefore saved it from the wrath of the New Page Patrollers. And to find a redirect's page, when you get redirected, right under the title of the target article, should be (Redirected from Example). Click on the link, and that's the redirect page. You can then edit it, or do whatever else you want. If you need anything else just ask me. Thank you. --43?9enter 06:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't all wikipedia articles drafts? But yes, deletion would certainly have been inconvenient. Your suggestions are useful. Thank you. GenKnowitall (talk) 07:29, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. (Yes, I'm still 43?9enter, I changed my name) --Σ 05:34, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Name change noted. Thank you.GenKnowitall (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WQA notice[edit]

Hello, GenKnowitall. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette alerts regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Melchoir (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Center of gravity/Archive 2. Talk 24May11 Article-Edit War has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:Main namespace should not be used to archive talk pages.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Singularity42 (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GenKnowitall. You have new messages at Singularity42's talk page.
Message added Singularity42 (talk) 17:01, 5 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ANI-notice[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Melchoir (talk) 23:08, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:Those guys are a bunch of fruits. I'd ignore them and drive on, soldier!  General Zukov  11:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by General Zukov (talkcontribs)

Hello, GenKnowitall. You have new messages at Floquenbeam's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:CG1.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CG1.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 19:03, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Center of gravity (physics) (February 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GenKnowitall! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 21:46, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Center of gravity (physics) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Center of gravity (physics). Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 21:49, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GenKnowitall. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Center of gravity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:41, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Diagram showing Center of Gravity in relation to other 'centers' in dynamics.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]