User talk:Gem131

Hello, Gem131! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:46, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

File copyright problem with File:Creative Pedagogy graph.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Creative Pedagogy graph.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain it. Maybe I am using something in the wrong manner. How should I mark the graph file, if I created it by myself? Just for now I deleted it from the article, but I think it graphically explains the essence better.

Gem131 Gem131 (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of MegaCreativity[edit]

The article MegaCreativity has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

neologism and veiled spam

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:02, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The article was rewritten (major rewriting) and changed. Still it was deleted. Strange.

How does X work?[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

The article was rewritten (major rewriting) and changed. The images were deleted. The link was deleted. Nothing was noticed and the article on MegaCreativity was deleted. Should I delete the "deletion" mark? I thought it was supposed to be deleted only by the person who placed it or by the administrator. So I left it in place. Was it wrong? Gem131 (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gem131 Gem131 (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to dispute deletion of page, 1) state your reason to keep the article at its talk page; 2) then, in the main article itself, add {{hangon}} template straight after the {{delete}} template without removing it. Thank you. %Gryllida 06:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Creative Pedagogy[edit]

The article Creative Pedagogy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:04, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tutorial[edit]

Please review the Wikipedia editing tutorial, specifically the section on how to create references. The referencing in the articles you write is not properly formatted, which makes it very difficult to verify these articles. rʨanaɢ (talk) 05:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, it looks much better now. Best, rʨanaɢ (talk) 23:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I made all the changes. I appreciate your help. Gem131 (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Genius may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Elias G. Carayannis (Ed.), New York: Springer, isbn=978-1-4614-3857-1, Vol. 1, pp. 289-299</ref>).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:28, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genius, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heritage and Newton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MegaCreativityCoverSingapore.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MegaCreativityCoverSingapore.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:FirstPageMegaCreativity.jpg[edit]

The file File:FirstPageMegaCreativity.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]