User talk:Geezertronic

February 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to British Rail Class 390, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Raywil (talk) 17:20, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Pendolino Window Size

Why are you persistently trying to censor the data on Pendolino window sizes ? During a bit of research to check that "The smaller size of the Pendolino windows has attracted comment" is factually correct even I was surprised at the number of comments on this on the internet (Websites, Forums, Blogs etc). This is an undeniable area of interest and the window size area figures are an attempt to inform the debate in an objective way. Do you not think these people have a right to the information ? The figure was obtained from the Crewe Heritage Centre and for you to delete this saying the figures should only be quoted if on Alstom`s website is extreme and inconsistent, quite apart from anything else neither Alstom nor Virgin would want the information on their websites, for obvious reasons, so what you`re actually doing is trying to censor the data. Why ? Are you also going to delete all the information on the Pendolino page if it doesn`t appear on Alstom`s website ? I have modified the passage on the Pendolino page to make it as objective and unbiased as possible and cannot fathom why this should be controversial.--JustinSmith (talk) 07:28, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Tell you what Geezertronic, I don`t agree with it at all, but I`ll leave it alone provided you also take off every "non official" (whatever that means) website linked piece of information off the Pendolino page, which is most of it by the way. Reversion battles are just immature but I do think you should be consistent.--JustinSmith (talk) 15:35, 6 October 2010 (UTC)