User talk:GSK/Archive 1

CSD

Hi GSK. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete File:Rocketjets.jpg, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion F4 because of the following concern: There is a grace period of 7 days after a tagging. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards feydey (talk) 09:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

feydey (talk) 09:19, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I saw that. I was going to remove the template, but was not sure how many places it was placed (other than the uploader's talk page and the image's page itself). Thank you for clearing that up. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)-- 20:12, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Lol at your warning

Of the school IP that vandalized my page, i was sitting right next to him :D--Jakezing (Your King (talk) 12:39, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Hello, GSK. You have new messages at TheCharlesOne's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

PlayStation 3 - Games

Hello, GSK. You have new messages at Sully1311's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Check my explanation.

The Sims 3

Resolved

Hi GSK,

I'm pretty sure my edit to The Sims 3 was constructive. Do you not think there will be a lot of people who read the article and do not know what 'seamless' means? I've linked to the relevant article to prevent this.

Unless I linked to the wrong seamless as I too am not familiar with it, is there an alternative article? Apologies if I sound pissed off but I'm not totally happy about it being marked as a test edit which I should use the sandbox for.

Cheers 81.157.119.196 (talk) 19:51, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Howdy. According to your edit, it provided a link to Seamless3d which appears to be software that does not describe the meaning of the word. Because the link could be seen as an advertisement for software not related to The Sims 3, I removed it and marked it as a test edit because it was not vandalism in any way. Hope this helps, and if not, please feel free to reply! :) --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 06:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I looked at the other Seamlesses and none of them appear the right definition either. Would a red link perhaps be the right thing to do?

81.157.119.196 (talk) 13:46, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Bop It Guy 20 unblock decline

You're welcome. I give credit for the use of humor in unblock declines to FisherQueen, who's really got it going on. Daniel Case (talk) 16:45, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

About the Windows 7 article

I think that, as we're talking about a new feature, what I wrote is related. It has been discussed quite a lot, (a simple google search reveals lots of results), and I think it should stay there, as part of the description of the new taskbar. --POWERCOMPUTER - ^TALK 14:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

What? Can't edit my own talk page?

Resolved

Ok, I understand that vandalism isn't good, I learned that the hard way when I had my edit war with someone else's user page, but I can't edit my own talk page? That's pathetic! If it's mine couldn't I do anything I want with it?

If it's against the rules for a good reason then I understand, I just felt it strange.

OzzyOzrock (talk) 01:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

You can edit your talk page, yes, but modifying others' comments is against the rules. I don't have an exact link at this time, but when I find one, I will be sure to inform you. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 01:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Editing_comments. Drmies (talk) 01:55, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you! --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 01:57, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, thank you.

Resolved

I understand now.

Now uh, can you tell me how to reply to comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by OzzyOzrock (talk • contribs) 02:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Just add them like normal. If you want to use talkback rules, see the notice at the top of my talk page. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 02:04, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

The Sims 3 vandalism

Resolved

Hi, I saw you reverted my modification and said it's vandalism. Could you please explain me a bit how was it vandalism ? I only said the game was leaked and it's true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanduu (talk • contribs) 07:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Your request for my presence is granted, sir.

Greetings, Mr. GameShowKid. It's going good for me. -- Chief of Staff Legion (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

SPI

When filing cases at SPI, please file under the name of the master account, not the suspected sock, filing under the sock messes the system up. Mayalld (talk) 18:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

DMcreif moves

Hello, GSK. You have new messages at Daniel Case's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

And again. Daniel Case (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

PSP mistake

Resolved

im sorry but i didnt make any changes to PSP 3000.....i am totally against vandalism myself....and i have no idea how it came in my watchlist :bewildered: —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thelivinglegend (talk • contribs) 15:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

This is what I was referring to. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 21:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (US game show)

Resolved

I censored the word in the article because I thought it would be offensive to other people if they saw the word uncensored.--Tomballguy (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Chris

Again, due to WP:CENSOR, vulgar and offensive words should not be censored.

“ Words and images that would be considered offensive, profane, or obscene by typical Wikipedia readers should be used if and only if their omission would cause the article to be less informative, relevant, or accurate, and no equally suitable alternatives are available. ”

--(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 19:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

The board addition and the audition addition are both true. Look it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GameGuy95 (talk • contribs) 19:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

However, until you provide a valid source, you cannot add it to Wikipedia. Sorry. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 20:02, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

If you look on the Buzzerblog article, it says that the revival will basically be the syndicated version "rule by rule" with Fastest Finger. The interview with Regis on abc.com cites that the celebrity will play for $50,000 for their charity of choice. Now, before editing out what I said, LOOK IT UP! —Preceding unsigned comment added by GameGuy95 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

All right, I apologize for that. I am just pointing out what is said. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GameGuy95 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

The syndicated article should seperate from the current article due to the fact that with the primetime version coming back, the syndicated version should have a different article to announce the progress of that show. Look at Deal or No Deal and Are You Smarter Than a 5th Grader; they have seperate articles themselves and the current progress is shown themselves. So, that is the reason why there should be a seperate article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GameGuy95 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Except the primetime show is coming back for a two-week run only. It's not a permanent return. For comparison, the reason that Super Millionaire has a separate article is because its gameplay was vastly different from the original. Please, discuss such drastic changes on the talk page for the article from now on. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 19:40, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Max mux

Resolved

Couldn;t him... let see. Oh yes the ravne rock article talk page... i made a comment, and suddenly he apparently showewd up complaining about it... but the ONLY way he coudl do that is looking through my contributions (which he has no need ot do.) So that tecnhniqly can be called stalking no?--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 12:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't care. I was talking about him, not you. Stay off of my talk page. Please. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 16:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

PSP-3000 Update INFO.

Resolved

Oh Sorry...your Right!! I forgot about that one the Sony Mylo

"And Technically I found out that the PSP Go is not a replacement on the PSP-3000,... Sony is still Working on the PSP-4000 or aka PSP2". "But thats up in the air still... SONY PLAYSTATION Network..mention the PSP GO is going to be a test Marketing product. if it does good...There going foward slowly fading the PSP-3000... But I can't see that maybe happening.??

—DJFLEX-mk2 2:01, 12 JUNE 2009 (UTC)

I don't care. I don't casually chat on Wikipedia. Sorry. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 06:03, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh Sorry, It's Cool... I was just trying to respond back politly... Trying to figure out how to use this (mytalk) for the first time. Have good evening. TY

—DJFLEX-mk2 2:15, 12 JUNE 2009 (UTC)

I...

Resolved

I wasn't baiting, him, he asked me why I don't like him so I explained it to him. Stop assuming shit bout me, mkay?--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 01:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

You are baiting him. You deliberately posted on his talk page trying to get him to retaliate against you. Stop. As I said, if you continue, I will push to get you blocked for violating Wikipedia policy.. again. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 01:52, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

No.. I didn't. He has asked me before, and I decided it was best just ot tell him so that wouldn't be happening again... Don't assume things grasshopper, your not always right.--Jakezing (Your King) (talk) 01:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Then don't let it happen again. This discussion is over. Please refrain from posting here again. Thank you. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 01:55, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Ta

Thanks for that - may I suggest posting it at the ANI thread to get broader attention thrown on it? Ironholds (talk) 06:39, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

You

You can be really annoying sometimes. No offense —Preceding unsigned comment added by GameGuy95 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

It's called enforcing Wikipedia policy. You're not above anyone else nor am I. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 00:42, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Who Wants to Be a Millionaire (US syndicated game show) has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Please don't call other editors contributions "shit" as you revert them as that could be construed as a personal attack. Also please remember to assume good intentions and remember to not bite the newcomers ;) Mifter (talk) 19:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

He had been previously warned about his contributions and blatantly ignored it. Also, WP:CENSOR. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 19:18, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Bop It Guy / Samlaptop accounts

Hi, User:GSK, I have just filed a report on this user at WP:ABUSE. I am attempting to attack the problem of this user's constant IP-based recidivism by going to the source of the problem. I noticed that you had had some previous interactions with this vandal and I wanted to offer you the chance to participate in the proceedings. If you would like to add any specific comments, please do so in the appropriate section at the bottom of the report. The report can be found here. Thanks for all the help you've been so far. -Thibbs (talk) 16:02, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

There's a lot of content there already; I have no idea what I'd even add. But hopefully this report can kick the user out once and for all. Good luck! --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 17:33, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

To clear things...

For some things to clear on:

1. The syndie/network split isn't such a bad idea. Now, even though an entire page split is out of the question, how about a split on the same page? By that, I mean that a syndication area for half of the page and network on the other with conjoined rules in the mix. Is that a bad idea?

2. This may seem short, but I'm looking for other things to clear up on.

To be continued....

GameGuy95 (talk) 20:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

I was only against an entire page split, since I didn't see why it would be needed. A same page split is more appropriate. --(GameShowKid)--(talk)--(evidence)--( 20:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)