User talk:Frevel8093

N.W.A article[edit]

Please stop your edit warring. If you continue to change page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia to fit your personal preferences, as you did at N.W.A, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.esse quam videri - to be rather than to seem (talk) 15:30, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Frevel8093, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 15:46, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

Frevel8093 (talk) 17:05, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{du-user}} Please delete my Wikipedia account

Accounts are not deleted. You can simply stop using it. If you wish, you can blank this talk page and/or put a {{retired}} notice on your user page. If you want more than that, and you are leaving Wikipedia permanently, see WP:Courtesy vanishing for what you can do. JohnCD (talk) 17:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Reply to your message on my talk page): {{db-user}} is what you would put on your user page User:Frevel8093 if you wanted that deleted, but there is nothing there, so you don't need to. As I said above, user accounts are not deleted, there simply isn't any way to do that, but you can just stop using it and walk away. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Girls Chase Boys, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Graham87 08:29, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maroon 5, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 17:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Lady Gaga, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. IPadPerson (talk) 22:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Kurt Cobain. Don't alter a direct quote. Binksternet (talk) 01:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Josh Dun does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles as you did at Remain_in_Our_Hearts_(DJ_Hidrro_song). Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive and could lead to edit wars and personal attacks, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Joshua Walton (talk) 23:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Twenty One Pilots. Walter Görlitz (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garage Music - Your Moving Of The Page[edit]

Your retitling and moving the page devoted to Garage Music without citing reasons/sources is against Wikipedia policy.

(Etheldavis (talk) 18:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to List of songs recorded by Lana Del Rey, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Littlecarmen (talk) 14:00, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at All I Want Is You (album), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Dan56 (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this obsession with flatlists, but some of the song articles you're making these petty MOS changes to could use edits that actually add to whatever scant information there currently is. Edit warring over flatlists isn't worth it. Dan56 (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Wildheart (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dan56 (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did here at Wildheart (album). Such attempts to avoid detection or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 14:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at 1989 (Taylor Swift album), you may be blocked from editing. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:51, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frevel8093[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Frevel8093 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 13:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.