User talk:Franklin10hhc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nomination of Dr Ashwin Porwal for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr Ashwin Porwal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Ashwin Porwal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alan Hardest (talk) 07:06, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Franklin10hhc, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Franklin10hhc! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Samwalton9 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016[edit]

Stop icon

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

Dr Ashwin Porwal has been deleted. It appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy is being given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our inclusion guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete it is considered disruptive and is grounds for blocking. Thank you. DGG ( talk ) 22:35, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]