User talk:Everlearningonline

Welcome!

Hello, Everlearningonline, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for the warm welcome, the pleasure is all mine and I love to help. I may not be too frequent yet I definetly love writing and having the knowledge expressed freely.

Everlearningonline (talk) 03:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Everlearningonline. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand...[edit]

Hello,

I do understand the conflict of interest, why is everyone attacking this? It's my first bio of a local businessman, i'm not related nor know him personally. I had to talk to the front office and go through many channels till i finally found a local business owner to let me have some of their content be used freely, since i did read the rules. And now that i'm ready, everything i put is being twisted to say i'm in favor. I've wrote about the spacecraft and john, genuinely, i will do anything to prove my innocents, please, what's the procedure for a situation like this?

Sincerely Everlearningonline (talk) 19:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Everlearningonline, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Draft:John Arwood have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:48, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Your addition to Draft:John Arwood has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Grayfell (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the content...[edit]

It can't be copyright but okay, how do i show permission? I suppose i can email them or something.

Everlearningonline (talk) 23:08, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What? It absolutely can be copyrighted, and it is copyrighted as far as Wikipedia is concerned. There are links above explaining how the copyright holder can donate copyrighted material. Are you the copyright holder? If so, you have a conflict of interest. If you're not, you should figure out why this information belongs here. These pages you keep copying are far, far too promotional to belong on Wikipedia anyway. Instead of trying to figure out a technicality or using close paraphrasing, find reliable, independent sources and summarize them in your own words. If reliable, independent sources don't exist, it is unlikely that the article belongs on Wikipedia. Your personal theories about copyright are not relevant. You need to follow Wikipedia's policies. Read some of these links that I've posted here and the above sections, and respond indicating that you will not post copyrighted material again. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 23:32, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, my apologies...[edit]

I see... No i don't own, know personally or owe anything to the guy I'm writing about. I just found all the space waste stuff cool, I see though where I broke Wiki rules and will correct the wording by having a neutral source, I now noticed that I read the early life paragraph from his website but I will add a new one from the government based public bio and other sources that have no positive sentencing to his life. Thank you for sending me the links that thought me what i needed to be a good wiki-member!

Regards, 15:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC) Everlearningonline (talk) 15:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not closely paraphrase sources. Write in your own words according to reliable sources. As has already been explained, close paraphrasing is still plagiarism. Further, you still haven't found any reliable sources. Grayfell (talk) 20:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closely Pharaphrase?[edit]

I don't understand how you can make such a claim, because it mentions how he started in other websites? Because the story would be the same irregardless, it's a bio. There's no promotional wording or anything our of the norm. All i added was his background and how many children he has. I need a source to add how many children someone has?

Everlearningonline (talk) 23:41, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Everlearningonline, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. theinstantmatrix (talk) 00:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

TonyBallioni (talk) 02:25, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Everlearningonline, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Everlearningonline, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- RoySmith (talk) 14:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]