User talk:Eubot/Archive 8
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Pajina Mahuluk listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pajina Mahuluk. Since you had some involvement with the Pajina Mahuluk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Paxena prinzsipale listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Paxena prinzsipale. Since you had some involvement with the Paxena prinzsipale redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Perms poslapis listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Perms poslapis. Since you had some involvement with the Perms poslapis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:09, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
Ozguerluek listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ozguerluek. Since you had some involvement with the Ozguerluek redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Ozgurluk listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ozgurluk. Since you had some involvement with the Ozgurluk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:50, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Starbucks montreal listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Starbucks montreal. Since you had some involvement with the Starbucks montreal redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 23:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
2001 U(c)S(c) Attack on Afghanistan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2001 U(c)S(c) Attack on Afghanistan. Since you had some involvement with the 2001 U(c)S(c) Attack on Afghanistan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2001 U(c)S(c) Attack on Afghanistan
A tag has been placed on 2001 U(c)S(c) Attack on Afghanistan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Rubbish computer 15:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Redirects
Why is this bot still running if it is making implausible redirects, such as the one mentioned above? Please advise. Thanks, --Rubbish computer 15:54, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Nintendo !!M listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Nintendo !!M. Since you had some involvement with the Nintendo !!M redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of LIIKII PARK
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on LIIKII PARK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Tavix (talk) 19:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Gueiquipedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gueiquipedia. Since you had some involvement with the Gueiquipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:10, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Guiquipedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Guiquipedia. Since you had some involvement with the Guiquipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:11, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Venaejae listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Venaejae. Since you had some involvement with the Venaejae redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 05:52, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Venaja listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Venaja. Since you had some involvement with the Venaja redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 06:52, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
This bot is malfuctioning
If this bot has no idea of the difference between orthography and English as she is spoke there is no point in it being here. Why did it create Venaja a redirect to Russia which serves no purpose and is not in any Finno-Ugric language. If it is another WP:G6#Housekeeping by "Neelix concession", for creating thousands of redirects without any thought, then it can also have that concession. Please, or ask the bot to reply at the conversation at {WP:RFD. Si Trew (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Marie Andre listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marie Andre. Since you had some involvement with the Marie Andre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:04, 17 May 2016 (UTC)