User talk:Emmanuelbruh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NP83. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Confederation of the Rhine have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. NP83 (talk) 12:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Confederation of the Rhine. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Confederation of the Rhine was changed by Emmanuelbruh (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864256 on 2023-04-09T21:32:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:32, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Byzantine Empire, you may be blocked from editing. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalizing, I’m just adding the eagle and flag, if no flag then no flag and no eagle, remove my edit if wrong. And if I am vandalizing, I wouldn’t know. Emmanuelbruh (talk) 14:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fictitious or ahistorical flags[edit]

Please stop edit warring over your additions of fictitious or ahistorical flags:

Just because a pretty image that looks vaguely like a flag exists on Wikimedia Commons does not make it something that you can include in an article without a source (especially for polities and states that existed before flags were invented). Nor are military standards flags. Ifly6 (talk) 15:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then how does the Roman Empire & western Roman Empire have a vexiliums? Emmanuelbruh (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]