User talk:Elizzaflanagan221

Welcome![edit]

Hi Elizzaflanagan221! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Love of Corey (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Willys[edit]

Willys 2A02:C7C:5E79:D500:6816:4F64:686A:EA1A (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Omegle and CatboyKami[edit]

Hi Elizzaflanagan221, in this edit to the Omegle article, you changed Tor Brookes’ alias “Philip Hedley” into his real name. However, a bit further down, the same paragraph refers to that alias, which no longer makes sense: “identified Hedley as Tor Gustafsson Brookes”. I would reword the paragraph myself, but the article is semi-protected now. Could you fix it?

An Australian white supremacist and former YouTuber named Tor Brookes (who used the alias Philip Hedley on Omegle, but is more generally known as "CatboyKami") popularised the site

Or even more like the old version, because his real name and outing are still mentioned anyway:

An Australian white supremacist and former YouTuber going by the alias Philip Hedley (later identified as Tor Brookes a.k.a. "CatboyKami") popularised the site

Cheers!

78.23.192.69 (talk) 14:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it mate Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 09:50, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jirenboro[edit]

Jitenboro oo 2409:4081:178A:2B3F:0:0:14BF:80A4 (talk) 11:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brenton Tarrant has been accepted[edit]

Brenton Tarrant, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Adam Lanza. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Please find the report here, which shows the plagiarised articles and the sources: https://api.ithenticate.com/en_us/dv/20220511?lang=en_us&o=103830074 MrBauer24 (talk) 04:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Deaths in 2023, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 14:19, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Lanza (November 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Justiyaya was:

Consensus needs to be first established at Talk:Sandy Hook Elementary School before submission, there had been multiple attempted creations of this article in the past, see [1]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Lanza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Justi yaya 07:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elizzaflanagan221! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Justi yaya 07:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Romano (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This appears to be WP:BLP1E

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jon Romano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:23, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hes notable for more than 1 event. hes a tiktok influencer now and is one of the few school shooters that aren't imprisoned. hes also a motivational speaker and has been involved in a sword attack that reached headlines. Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hi Elizzaflanagan221! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Also, I disagree with your adding of Columbine copycats as it is unsourced, yet I can't revert it right now as I have met WP:3RR. Aaron Liu (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Roger 8 Roger. An edit that you recently made to Christchurch mosque shootings seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please think before changing an article. Reading your changes before submission can also be helpful. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 06:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah wdym by a "test". i was just adding information on the locations and their importance in the shootings???? Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 06:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, make your point on the article talk page. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 08:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 03:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this reversion [2] is not a good look, nor is your potshot on the talkpage of Radio Libertaire. Acroterion (talk) 03:16, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wtf is a "potshot" and whats the revision on RHS gotta do with anything Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 04:00, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You replaced unsourced and probably copied content in one, and you used the talkpage for unfocused, unhelpful griping on the other. It's a pattern of concerning behavior, along with your attacks on other editors who disagree with you. Please reconsider your approach to editing and to interactions with other editors. Acroterion (talk) 04:05, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

with the "potshot" i was wondering if someone could propose the article for deletion as its been a stub since the begining in 2007. idk how to propose articles for deletion and found it an utterly useless article. Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 04:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then propose it for deletion. Talkpages aren't fora for unconstructive gripes. Acroterion (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, you would need to take it to AfD, since a PROD was declined in 2008. Acroterion (talk) 04:14, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Acroterion (talk) 03:19, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yeah i understand what u saying even though i would hardly call it a personal attack but whatever you say man. Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 04:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jon Romano (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jon Romano and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 06:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Elizzaflanagan221. Thank you for your work on Trial of Dylan Roof. Voorts, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wdym by 'tag'. Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 23:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Adam Lanza has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Adam Lanza. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Lanza (February 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

The article topic significantly overlaps with Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and consensus should be established on that page's talk page before further submissions. Also organizational problems.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Lanza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"IGet moon" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect IGet moon has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § IGet moon until a consensus is reached. Shearonink (talk) 02:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"IGet vape" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect IGet vape has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § IGet vape until a consensus is reached. Shearonink (talk) 04:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"IGet mega" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect IGet mega has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § IGet mega until a consensus is reached. Shearonink (talk) 04:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"IGet legend" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect IGet legend has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § IGet legend until a consensus is reached. Shearonink (talk) 04:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"IGet bar" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect IGet bar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § IGet bar until a consensus is reached. Shearonink (talk) 04:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"IGet" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect IGet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 21 § IGet until a consensus is reached. Shearonink (talk) 04:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Lanza (March 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

As before. Submitted with no changes or improvements from when I last declined. An article of a nature this controversial and with an overlap with another page has to be both very well written and demonstrate its notability outside of the other page: this does neither.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adam Lanza and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elliot Rodger article[edit]

Hello. I saw on the Elliot Rodger talkpage that you believe he should have an article. I believe he should too and created a draft and want to get your opinion on it. Do you think it is any good? Shoot for the Stars (talk) 06:52, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's a good draft. It goes into a lot of depth about him and his life which shouldn't be in the 2014 Isla Vista killings article. I believe it should be created. Elizzaflanagan221 (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on 2014 Isla Vista killings talkpage and have explained why Rodger is notable and how he is one of the more known and followed mass murderers. I explained that this was the first case of misogynistic murder that went off and that there are hundreds of sources talking about it. It's hard to see how Nikolas Cruz or Seung-Hui Cho have their own separate articles despite being way less notable than Rodger. Unlike the previous murderers I mentioned, Rodger and his attacks STILL inspire other mass murders almost ten years later. I mean look at the Incel page. The article has numerous examples of other men who committed the same type mass murder and referenced Rodger as their inspiration for doing it. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 07:41, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi Elizzaflanagan221. Thank you for your work on Sesler family murders. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]