User talk:Ejenn2

Topics[edit]

Roman Fever Ejenn2 (talk) 01:51, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cask of Amontillado Ejenn2 (talk) 01:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Instructor Comments[edit]

All of these look like great options, Ejenn2. One challenge of working in major author pages like these is that so much work has already been done on them, and it may be difficult (though certainly not impossible) for you to find a way to substantially contribute. For living authors like King, especially, huge, rabid fan bases may result in user micromanaging of your contributions. However, that also offers a wonderful opportunity since those pages are often also unwieldy and disorganized. You may also find that you want to work on scholarship for a specific work by one of these authors, rather than the author page, which may give you more opportunity to make a substantial contribution. You may want to get started narrowing these down by looking at the article talk pages for each of these pages, which should give you an idea of the kind of work other users think needs to be done on these articles. I look forward to seeing what you decide! Nadinecross78 (talk) 03:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Contributions[edit]

on Cask of Amontillado

The plot summary has several gaps in the plot line, as well as misinformation, that I will correct and revise to make the section more accurate and complete.
The analysis displays an incorrect motive and there is also misinformation in the “analysis” section; I will correct this information and cite accordingly. I will provide in-depth analysis on this topic, providing a more well-rounded analysis section.

on Roman Fever

The plot summary is severely lacking in content and does not provide any actual detail regarding the plot of the story. I will revise this extensively so readers have a better understanding of the storyline.
There is no "analysis" section. I will create an analysis section and provide relevant information and links to further the readers study of the text.
There is also no mention of "dramatic irony" which is one of the main elements of the story. I will add this information probably under the proposed "analysis" section.

Ejenn2 (talk) 02:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC) Ejenn2 (talk) 02:36, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]