User talk:Dreisar20

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 13:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ThePongster, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi ThePongster! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to A. J. Edu, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 13:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A. J. Edu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power forward. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Clarkcj12. I noticed that in this edit to A. J. Edu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Clarkcj12 (talk) 10:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:09, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to A. J. Edu, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. — SkiMaskA⛧ ^{💬 msg me} 13:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. CalDoesIt (talk) 06:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to A. J. Edu, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:43, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Dennis Schröder appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 01:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm IndexAccount. Your recent edit to the page Aleksej Pokuševski appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --IndexAccount (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: I will issue a block if there is more disruption. Please examine the above messages and do not repeat the problems. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 04:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, do not use "fixed typo" for an edit summary unless the edit really is fixing a typo. Misleading edit summaries are disruptive. Johnuniq (talk) 04:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Johnuniq: ThePongster is continuing to ignore the warnings left and also continues using misleading edit summaries. I think that is enough to send this user on vacation. – Sabbatino (talk) 17:04, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dwight Howard, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sabbatino. Your recent edit to the page Kelly Oubre Jr. appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:08, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Miranda. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:42, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksej Pokuševski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power forward.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration is required[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ThePongster: At Wikipedia, editors must collaborate with others. That means you must respond appropriately to the many notices above, including the warning I left earlier. Do not perform these kinds of edits against consensus. Also, you must stop using an edit summary of "fixed typo" when you obviously are doing something completely different. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 22:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aleksej Pokuševski, without giving a valid reason for the change in the edit summary. Your content change does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. It's not a typo. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. --DragonFederal (talk) 07:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 04:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't make WP:OR edits saying a trade is complete using a report based on an unidentified source. For Danny Green, this source clearly says it can't happen until Dec 8 at the earliest.—Bagumba (talk) 05:00, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not change content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Aleksej Pokuševski, without giving a valid reason for the change in the edit summary. Your content change does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. It's not a typo. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. --IndexAccount (talk) 21:32, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kai Sotto. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Not everything is a typo ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeremy Lin. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 03:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Template:Milwaukee Bucks roster ‎. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 13:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You also continue to incorrectly mark all of your edits as "Fixed typo".—Bagumba (talk) 13:31, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jalen Green. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:21, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to New York Knicks, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 11:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Paul George. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 07:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Engr. Smitty. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, JJ Redick, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 17:21, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ThePongster! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Joseph Stalin that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lervin Flores[edit]

Hello, ThePongster. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lervin Flores, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kai Sotto. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 04:00, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Kai Sotto. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 12:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks!!! ThePongster (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lervin Flores[edit]

Hello, ThePongster. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lervin Flores".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rename from "ThePongster" to "Dreisar20" successful[edit]

Rename from "ThePongster" to "Dreisar20" per request --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello, Dreisar20, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Aeiou001 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dreisar20, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not blank SPIs filed against you and allow us to process the full case. Thanks. --Blablubbs|talk 09:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dreisar20, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Sabbatino (talk) 18:28, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dreisar20. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dreisar20. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dreisar20, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:33, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]