User talk:Docteur Mansour Chehabi

November 2021[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani, from its old location at User:Docteur Mansour Chehabi/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 14:38, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani (November 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article needs serious rewriting. Phrasing such as "His awesome attachment to precious Persia, was strongly genuine" is not acceptable. Please also remove the Wikipedia:External links before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Docteur Mansour Chehabi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani (January 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft needs serious rewriting. In its current state, the draft glorifies the subject in a totally unencyclopedic way. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 04:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 04:05, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johannes Maximilian, thank you for having been kind enough to read my draft, Mahmoud Shehabi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mahmoud_Shehabi_Khorassani on January 6, but unfortunately given that it was not in the standard required by Wikipedia, you refused it. Now I tried again to put it in required standard, I hope :). Can you please take a look at it and tell me if it's ok or something still needs to be changed. This is now nearing 3 months I asked for a new Review and I am awaiting for it.

I would like to add that this article concerns a very well-known personality in Iran (1903-1986) and that there is already a Wikipedia page in Persian and one in French on him.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Chehabi

https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/محمود_شهابی_خراسانی Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 10:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

About this draft[edit]

Hello, Greenman, and Johannes Maximilian, thank you for having been kind enough to read my draft, Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassaniو but unfortunately given that it was not in the standard required by wikipedia, you refused it. Now I tried again to put it in required standard, I hope :). can you please take a look at it and tell me if it's ok or something still needs to be changed. I would like to add that this article concerns a very well-known personality in Iran (1903-1986) and that there is already a wikipedia page in Persian and one in French on him.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmoud_Chehabi

https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/محمود_شهابی_خراسانی

--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 08:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani (May 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zippybonzo was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Reads like an essay, also the references section is a little messed up.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zippybonzo | talk 16:04, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Docteur Mansour Chehabi. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ARose Wolf 16:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Docteur Mansour Chehabi! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, please how can I improve my page to be accepted, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Missvain were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Hi.

I'm sorry, but the sourcing here helps the subject meet our general notability guidelines nor WP:NACADEMIC. The majority of the sources are primary or written by the subject.

We need *significant* coverage in notable media outlets or by notable publishers. Examples: magazine and newspaper reviews and features about Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani specifically; books or white papers written ABOUT Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani; television and radio features ABOUT Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani. You can find other suggestions at WP:NACADEMIC.

If those are available, please improve this submission. If not, then it appears to be WP:TOOSOON for Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani to have a Wikipedia article.

I hope you will consider improving existing Wikipedia content about other subjects of interest!

If you have any questions please ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE.

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 17:12, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Missvain, Thank you for comments on this draft. I'm trying to determine why citations, for example: This book :

[Biography, scientific and cultural services of the late Professor Mahmoud Shehabi Khorasani, Association of Cultural Works and Honors.زندگی نامه و خدمات علمی و فرهنگی مرحوم استاد محمود شهابی خراسانی انجمن آثار ومفاخر فرهنگی, . ISBN 978-964-528-280-4 تهران: انجمن آثار و مفاخر فرهنگی ،۶۶۴]

Or, this article written in one of IRAN’s largest national and quotidian newspapers:

[Mahmoud Shehabi by Ali Najafi and Jalal Rafi: Ettelaat newspaper, national edition, Wednesday, August 23, 2009, Tehran, Iran [ https://www.ettelaat.com/?p=450768 ],

Or, another publication in the same journal : [Commemoration of the late Professor Mahmoud Shehabi: Ettelaat newspaper, national edition, Saturday, January 21, 2017, Tehran, Iran [ https://www.ettelaat.com/mobile/?p=131706&device=phone ]

Or, these important literary magazine of Iran likes:

Mehrnameh Magazine No. 48 August 2016, Pages 90 to 106, Tehran, Iran.

or Interview with Dr. Ali Akbar Shahabi: Kayhan Farhangi magazine, 4th of July 1987, page 5, Teheran, Iran.

and other mainstream sources fail to meet citation guidelines in this case.

So,I would ask you if possible to reconsider your judgment concerning this Draft Thanks Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 08:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani has been accepted[edit]

Mahmoud Shehabi Khorassani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HI, Primefac, Just wanted to say thank you for reviewing my article today

Keep up the great work 👍

Thanks again, Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 14:09, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

پرویز صانعی