User talk:Dmitry Dzhagarov

188.129.191.124 = Dmitry Dzhagarov = Дмитрий Дж.

Briefly about me: I graduated from Moscow State University in 1972;

Ph.D. in Biological Sciences from 1981.

Senior researcher in the Сenter of Medical Biophysics at the Institute of Cardiology (Tbilisi) from 1982 to 1997.

Since 1997, an unemployed disabled person.

mail to: ipsc-lab@mail.ru

Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 11:35, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Dmitry Dzhagarov, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please also read WP:TECHNICAL regarding technical articles. Wikipedia is not effective when articles are written at a level that most readers cannot understand.--Animalparty-- (talk) 20:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invaluable[edit]

Your work on Induced stem cells is extremely valuable. I hope you will stay with it. I think we can deal with this issue. Thanks again. Lfstevens (talk) 07:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of NgAgo[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on NgAgo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3547. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dmitry. I could verify from the quotes at Paul Knoeffler's blog that most of that article was taken word-for-word from the original NgAgo paper, so much in fact that I couldn't really salvage anything. You might want to add a section about NgAgo to Genome editing or you could write the article again, but you must use your own words. Some quoting is OK, but it must be limited and in quote marks. Fences&Windows 20:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copy and pasting[edit]

We run "copy and paste" detection software on new edits. One of your edits appear to be infringing on someone else's copyright. See also Wikipedia:Copy-paste. We at Wikipedia usually require paraphrasing. If you own the copyright to this material please follow the directions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials to grant license. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170411104508.htm

Dear Doc James. Is not it simpler and more correct for you to just paraphrase the text so that it would not violate the rules instead of deleting it? You "punished not me, but the readers". It's a very stupid Wikipedia policy to delete text instead of helping authors to rephrase the text. For the reader the meaning is important, and not how this or that it is written Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 16:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You must paraphrase. We take copyright seriously. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:08, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To rephrase is important in humanitarian works. In the natural sciences, on the contrary, it is important to preserve the author's text in order not to distort the meaning that the author has invested. Of course, it is necessary to quote the source - the author (so as not to violate his rights). Very stupid Wikipedia policy - do the opposite. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 13:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Idiocy of Wikipedia policy stems from the idiocy of legal thinking, which inhibits the development of mankind ^[1] Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That the law is sometimes harmful to the development of humankind, to that I agree. But we are required to operate in such a world and abide by those rules. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:45, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sambucus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please use reviews from WP:MEDRS sources to infer health effects. Also, there is no evidence of any compound in elderberries other than vitamin C having dietary antioxidant properties. Zefr (talk) 15:46, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of RG7834[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page RG7834 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342334509_Chemical_inhibition_of_PAPD57_rescues_telomerase_function_and_hematopoiesis_in_dyskeratosis_congenita, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00044-019-02455-w, and https://www.genengnews.com/news/potential-new-therapies-for-telomere-diseases-identified/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — Diannaa (talk) 19:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baby boom (disambiguation)[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Baby boom (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Perhaps the red link could be added to an existing article with the reference that you included? Leschnei (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Mediterranean diet. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 05:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link was added only because it contained newer data on the topic and therefore could be of benefit to readers. If Wikipedia is only ossified old data and the development of the topic is not included in its tasks, I apologize.Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 07:16, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Your edit to Isofalcarintriol has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 06:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Carrot, you may be blocked from editing. ... and on Isofalcarintriol. Your claims from in vitro research are unencyclopedic, WP:MEDINVITRO, and are baseless exaggerations which do not comply with WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 15:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

Your edit to GLP-1 receptor agonist has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. @DanCherek: You warned this user recently, so I'm keeping you in the loop GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 00:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DanCherek (talk) 00:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I read through all of the previous copyright-related discussions (including some that you previously blanked) on this talk page before applying this block. I know you think our copyright policy is "stupid", but it is policy nonetheless. We're here to build a free encyclopedia – i.e., one where the information in articles is freely reusable under the terms of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, and copying text from incompatibly-licensed copyright sources is unfortunately not consistent with that goal. If you wish to appeal this block (which I hope you will consider doing), please take a look through the copyright policy and commit to avoiding copyright violations going forward. DanCherek (talk) 00:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC) Dear DanCherek, thank you for your clarifications, but I’m afraid that Wikipedia has lost another one enthusiast who was ready to help spread knowledge for free. Now education is in the tenacious hands of bureaucrats and people who do not hesitate to call themselves nicknames, which thirty years ago could not be called anything other than an obscene curse. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 12:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why shouldn't Wikipedia use artificial intelligence to paraphrase copyright texts or consider such texts not as copyright infringement, but as advertising of the cited work? Especially if there is a link to the original source. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 12:36, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of removing information that may be useful to readers, you can simply highlight it with a background color as a free advertisement for the cited material! Such material will not be credited to the person who posted it as his authorship, but will remain in the article for those who will paraphrase the material in accordance with copyright rules. Dmitry Dzhagarov (talk) 08:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria

[1] Torching the Modern-Day Library of Alexandria

[1]