User talk:DivineAlpha/Archives/Archive 6

Collect Proposed Decision[edit]

You were gentler with the vandal in giving a Level 1 template than I would have been. I will note that the vandal was then indeffed as an apparent throw-away account. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:103.13.101.142[edit]

103.13.101.142 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)--

That user open proxy,see my userpage history ...Vvvaggot (talk) 03:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you![edit]

Hey there. I've been noticing a lot of anti-vandalism work by you. So, thanks for helping out. I appreciate it! You should consider joining Operation Enduring Encyclopedia, if you haven't already. -- Mysterious Gopher (talk, contribs), 03:03, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mysterious Gopher: I might, but I do similar work on small wikis. DivineAlpha 03:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

editing greennet page[edit]

i have some valid criticism of this 'ethical' isp. how can i voice it on wikipedia without it being removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.216.140 (talk) 03:00, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

how does this wikipedia thing work? how is it decided that what already exists is valid, correct and fair? eg. i find the greennet article misleading. i know people who have been misled. does wikipedia have a friendly link with greennet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.216.140 (talk) 03:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You don't. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Yamla (talk) 12:29, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar![edit]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Good work with the foul vandalism onslaught tonight. Name Omitted (talk) 05:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago[edit]

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]